The correct answer is B. A simple sentence expresses one complete thought; it's composed of an independent clause that follows the subject-verb pattern.
Explanation
A simple sentence is a syntactic unit that expresses a complete idea, which means it is an idependent clause. The sentence has a basic structure that is composed of a subject, verb (action), and complement. Simple sentences are independent clauses because their meaning does not depend on any complement that contextualizes them. An example of a simple sentence is "I play in the park with my friends". In this sentence the subject is "I", the verb is "game" and the complement is "in the park with my friends". According to the above, the correct answer is B.
The case you describe is: SWEATT v. PAINTER
Details:
The case of <em>Sweatt v. Painter (</em>1950), challenged the "separate but equal" doctrine regarding racial segregated schooling which had been asserted by an earlier case, <em>Plessy v. Ferguson</em> (1896).
Heman Marion Sweatt was a black man who was not allowed admission into the School of Law of the University of Texas. Theophilus Painter was the president of the University of Texas at the time. So that's where the names in the lawsuit came from.
In the case, which made its way to the US Supreme Court, the ultimate decision was that forcing Mr. Sweatt to attend law school elsewhere or in a segregated program at the University of Texas failed to meet the "separate but equal" standard, because other options such as those would have lesser facilities, and he would be excluded from interaction with future lawyers who were attending the state university's main law school, available only to white students. The school experience would need to be truly equal in order for the "separate but equal" policy to be valid.
In 1954, another Supreme Court decision went even further. <em>Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka </em>extended civil liberties to all Americans in regard to access to all levels of education. The <em>Plessy v. Ferguson </em>case had said that separate, segregated public facilities were acceptable as long as the facilities offered were equal in quality. In <em>Brown v. Board of Education</em>, segregation was shown to create inequality, and the Supreme Court unanimously ruled segregation to be unconstitutional. After the Brown v. Board of Education decision, there was a struggle to get states to implement the new policy of desegregated schools, but eventually they were compelled to do so.
False. If your brakes fail, use the E-brake. Hope this helps! :)
Answer:
Based on the chart, the one that best explains why France and Britain approached peace talks differently than the United States is that These countries suffered a large number of deaths, casualties, and severe economic loss as a result of the war.
Explanation:
France and Great Britain were severely affected by The World Wide War I, these numbers represent millions of loss in many ways that will continue affecting the country afterwards, the economic affectation was not only because of the quantity shown after war but all the citizens who died in it and will leave unsupported families that will experience unbalance and financial problems.
The question is asking to state one of the biggest criticisms of the USA Patriot act and base on my research and further investigation, I would say that one of the biggest criticism of the USA patriot act would be that It weakens the protection of civil liberties. I hope you are satisfied with my answer
