1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
krek1111 [17]
4 years ago
5

A Democratic president faced with a Republican-majority Senate is trying to appoint judges to the federal bench. Which of the fo

llowing is the most likely reason that his appointments might be blocked? A.a president is more likely to appoint judges who would agree with him ideologically B.a Democratic president is more likely to appoint people who are unqualified C.Republicans have an interest in slowing down the court system, and fewer judges would mean that each existing judge would have to do more work D.none of the above reasons explain why judicial appointments might be blocked
History
1 answer:
Elden [556K]4 years ago
8 0
<span>"A.a president is more likely to appoint judges who would agree with him ideologically"</span> is the proper answer. One of the greatest power of the presidency is the ability to appoint judges, and they're not going to waste that power appointing people they don't like.
You might be interested in
write a paragraph that relates the term czar to the term absolutism by giving two examples of czars and telling how they ruled a
NikAS [45]
Absolutism is a form of government where one person or small group of people have unlimited power.  The term "czar" means "caesar" ("king"), and therefore can be considered a type of absolute ruler.  Ivan the Great of Russia (r.1462-1505) took the title of "czar" after marrying the niece of the last Byzantine empire.  After the fall of Constantinople (and thus, the Byzantine Empire), Moscow became the most powerful city in the Eastern Orthodox Church.  Thus, the "czar" of Russia would from then on claim to be the inheritor of the Byzantine emperor and protector of the Eastern Orthodox Church.

Two rulers of Russia stand out as being "absolute rulers":  Peter the Great (r.1682-1725) and Catherine the Great (r.1762-1796).  Peter wanted to make Russia into a modern nation, and forced Russians to adopt European culture.  To do this, Peter created a new class of nobles that were given land in exchange for their loyalty to the government.  Nobles were given total control over their peasants, who saw their freedom decrease during Peter's rule.  To reform the government, Peter created a centralized bureaucracy of non-elected advisers and local governments were placed under the direct control of the czar.  Peter also brought the Orthodox Church under his authority and created a council of bishops appointed by him.  While many of Peter's policies improved the Russian economy, he divided the Russian people.  (See image:  Courtesy of saint-petersburg.com)

Catherine the Great began her rule by seizing power from her own husband!  Catherine greatly admired Peter I and continued to expand and modernize Russia.  Many people consider Catherine's reign a golden age of Russia because she supported the arts, education, and culture.  Despite being influenced by the European enlightenment, Catherine feared chaos and peasant uprisings were brutally crushed by her army.  She allowed nobles to treat their serfs (peasants) however they wished.  More peasants than ever were forced into serfdom than ever before, and their position worsened.  

6 0
3 years ago
This article talks about several Mesoamerican civilizations. IF we just focus on the Olmec, what are the 5 most important pieces
Katena32 [7]

Answer:

The Olmec Leave Their MarkThe Olmec contributed much to later Mesoamerican civilizations. They influenced the powerful Maya, who will be dis-cussed in Chapter 16. Olmec art styles,

Explanation:

6 0
2 years ago
Is money essential to long-distance trade, or does
dusya [7]

Answer:

No.

Explanation:

Goods for goods (barter) produce more significance results in the  long   distance trade because the traders sold goods and purchase other goods which wanted to sell in his region so there is no significance of money in these long distance trade, the people prefer barter system for them. In ancient times, people sell their items and purchase what they needed with the exchange of items.

3 0
3 years ago
Plssssssssssss answer
Inessa [10]

Answer:

1

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Summarize one message the books of Hosea, Amos, and Micah have in common.
grigory [225]

Answer:

Um one sec sorry

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • 5. What are the two types of Federalism?
    10·2 answers
  • Canada’s geographic regions
    5·1 answer
  • Which best describes president Theodore Roosevelt's policy towards monopolies?
    15·1 answer
  • How did most goods get from China to Europe along the Silk Road?
    9·2 answers
  • What was an accomplished by the Song Dynasty of China
    8·2 answers
  • If you were a queen or king what will you do to strengthen your kingdom?
    6·1 answer
  • What did Cicero argue for to repair the damaged republic?
    5·1 answer
  • The US supported the buffalo hunters as a means of destroying which Native American group?
    11·1 answer
  • The weather conditions at a given place over a long period of time is known as
    9·1 answer
  • What could have the us government and American settlers should have in order to treat the Cherokee people with fairness equality
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!