Answer:
Simple rate of return = 17.7%
Explanation:
Simple rate of return = incremental operating income ÷ initial investment
Depreciation = $468,000 ÷ 6years = $78,000
incremental operating income = $161,000-$78,000 =$83,000
Simple rate of return = $83,000÷$468,000=17.7%
Answer:
Explanation:
The expected value is calculated by using the probability of each event. If the chance of dying is 0.60% then the chance living is 99.40%. The expect value formula is:
∑[(xi)*P(xi)] (for all i events).
In this problem we have two events: live or die. If the person dies the family receives $1,000,000 (X1=$1,000,000) and if the person lives the family receives $0 (X2=$0). The probability of receiving $1,000,000 is 60% (P(x1)=0.006) and the probability of receiving $0 is 99.40% (P(x2)=0.994)
Using the formula the expected value of the policy (without the insurance cost):
$1,000,000* (0.006)+ $0*(0,994)= $6,000
If we subtract the insurance value:
$6,000-$5,500= $500
Auto and troph
That’s your answer!!
Answer:
Cantril Ladder
Explanation:
Cantril ladder approach was developed by Hadley Cantril. The approach is a method of assessing the well being of individuals. The cantril scale is represented by an imaginary ladder with steps numbered from 1 to 10 wherein each step denotes a happiness level.
For example, level one would relate to poor well being i.e the case of individual being least happy whereas level 10 would represent highest satisfaction in life and happiness.
As per the research conducted across the globe, the cantril scale of well being and happiness correlated really well with the income of the respondents indicating, that well being and happiness are directly related to an individual's income level.
The correct answer would be option D. Mr. Jones, who has positive client reviews and charges moderate fees.
Her goal is to achieve a 8% return in one year so that she can buy a house. Mr. Jones, who has positive client reviews and charges moderate fees, would be the most appropriate one for her.
Explanation:
When choosing the best for you, you must make a decision by considering all the factors contributing in the choice of that alternative.
So when Helena wants to hire an adviser who can help her guide her with the investments, she should choose the one who has positive clients' reviews. This would be to first priority for Helena to choose the adviser. Secondly if that adviser charges moderate fee, then this would be a plus point for that alternative.
So Helena must choose Mr. Jones who has both positive reviews as well as charges moderate fees.
Learn more about decision making at:
brainly.com/question/9075718
#LearnWithBrainly
