Answer:
$1,950 more than expected
Explanation:
In this question ,we have to compare the revenues based on expected and the actual
So, the expected revenues would be
= Number of customers × per hour rate × expected time spent
= 30 customers × $26 × 8 hours
= $6,240
And, the actual revenues would be
= Number of increased customers × per hour rate × average time spent
= 42 customers × $26 × 7.5 hours
= $8,190
The revenue is increased by
= $8,190 - $6,240
= $1,950 more than expected
This is the answer but the same is not provided in the given options
Answer:
b) both the values that society places on those products and the costs to society of producing those products
Explanation:
When the "invisible hand" guides economic activity, prices are known as equilibrium prices.
Equilibrium price is found where the demand curve intersects with the supply curve .
Equilibrium price is the price where both the value that society places on those products and the costs to society of producing those products are equal.
I hope my answer helps you
Answer: (D) Efficiency
Explanation:
The evaluation of the efficiency is the process in which we concerned about the efficiency of system so that it produced the desirable result.
We can also evaluate the efficiency by using the ratio of the output of the system to the input in the form of quantitative and the qualitative.
According to the question, the researcher work is basically refers evaluation of the efficiency as the implementation of the welfare program and the researcher argues are basically based on the efficiency evaluation.
Therefore, Option (D) is correct.
Based on the amount earned and the monthly expenses, Eric should set aside <u>$16,200</u> for an emergency fund.
It is generally recommended that when settling cash aside for an emergency fund, the amount that one sets aside be 3 times their monthly expenses.
Eric's monthly expenses are $5,400 so the amount to be set aside should be:
= 5,400 x 3
= $16,200
In conclusion, Eric should set aside $16,200 for the emergency fund.
<em>Find out more at brainly.com/question/13420184. </em>
Answer:
No, because, while the Seventh Amendment gives both the plaintiff and defendant the right to demand a jury trial in civil actions, when a case presents both legal and equitable claims, the right is only preserved for all legal claims, not equitable claims.
Explanation:
Equitable claim is one that requests an injunction from a court. That is the court is asked to compel another party to either take an action or refrain from taking an action. The focus is to prevent a future harm.
A legal claim is one that where the plaintiff proves harm done against their person and he is seeking compensation for harm inflicted.
The Seventh Amendment gives parties the right to request a jury trial only on legal claims.
In the given scenario the case is one that is an equitable claim. The owner's complaint requested money damages and an injunction to stop the construction. This is done to stop breach of the non-compete.
As the Seventh Amendment only allows jury trial for legal claims, the former manager cannot demand a jury trial.
