1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Alika [10]
4 years ago
12

During the debate over the Constitution, which issue divided the Framers into two parties

History
2 answers:
liraira [26]4 years ago
6 0
The power of the central government

Iteru [2.4K]4 years ago
5 0

<u>The issue that divided the Framers of the Constitution into two parties was the scope that the central government should have.</u>

The writers of the Constitution strongly disagreed on ideology, and this led to the formation of two marked parties: The Federalist and the Anti-Federalists (The Democratic-Republican party). On one hand, the Federalist party, which was mainly supported by bankers, businessmen and merchants, deemed necessary a strong national government and a national bank to lead the nation.

On the other hand, the Anti-Federalists, mainly consisting of planters, small farmers, and artisans, promoted a weak central government and leaned to give more power to the states and local governments instead. They also opposed the creation of a national bank.

You might be interested in
15 POINTS + MARKED BRAINLIEST
ollegr [7]

Answer:

Pioneer farmers, or homesteaders, began settling in California, Oregon, and other parts of the West during the early 1800's. After the Civil War, however, western farming expanded greatly. Homesteaders, mostly white, quickly populated the Great Plains from 1870 to 1890

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
AP WORLD HISTORY CUMULATIVE EXAM 2
SIZIF [17.4K]

Answer:

Answers:

A)

C)

F)

D)

A)

C)

C)

A)

D)

C)

F)

you will have to do the written responses and I forgot the other questions

hopefully your test was the same as mines

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
does the Court's decision in Marburt v. Madison to exercise judicial review make u.s. democracy mpre stable or lessz so?
alina1380 [7]

The decision was taken by the US Supreme Court in the case Marbury v. Madison makes the US democracy more stable.

In this case, Marbury v. Madison the US Supreme Court declared that is the job of the US Supreme Court to rule if a law is constitutional or not. This puts limits on the Congress power and it is one of the limits given to the judiciary branch by the checks and balances system. This makes democracy more stable because the Constitution is the base of everything and it will be preserved.

5 0
3 years ago
Pa help po please......​
nekit [7.7K]

Answer:

1. A

2. C

3. B

4. D

5. A

6. C

I hope this helps

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What factors sparked the prosperity of the 1920s?
Marrrta [24]
The Great Depression
6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How did monotheism differ from other early beliefs
    8·2 answers
  • Market power in the united states was often gained in the latter part of the nineteenth century by
    9·1 answer
  • Which country became the dominant world power as result of the napolenic wars?
    11·2 answers
  • How did philosophers of the Middle Ages study nature?
    8·1 answer
  • The majority of the population of New Zealand is
    8·1 answer
  • Which countries were attacked but not conquer my axis?
    14·1 answer
  • How can transposing a piece help the woodwinds?
    14·1 answer
  • Will give brainliest:) 3 Spanish questions
    8·1 answer
  • Why did some U.S. business leaders want Hawaii to be annexed to the United States?
    9·2 answers
  • Almost a year after the ghetto was established, the Nazis
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!