All categories

3 years ago

Should Congress have the power to refuse to vote on a justice nominee? Why or why not?

Law

1 answer:

Shkiper50 [21]3 years ago

6 0

Answer:

It is the duty of Congress to have hearings in order to confirm a Supreme Court Justice nominee (as stated in the Constitution). This exclusive power rests on the U.S. Senate. The consensus, however, may be different and may vote against a nominee. Political parties within the Senate generally get in the way of who will vote and who won't, and vice-versa.

Explanation:

For example, Merrick Garland (former President Obama's nominee) was not given a hearing. Furthermore, Congress failed to perform the duties to have a hearing and decide whether to vote or deny a nominee. This is an example of how they refused to even vote on him. This is not the way government should operate.

You might be interested in

If you were in charge of the criminal justice reform in the United States, what one change would you make to make the system mor

ivann1987 [24]

Answer:

I would dsicontinue the use of polygraph machines because they are only 50% accurate

Explanation:

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Select the correct comparison between science and technology.

finlep [7]

Answer:

post option also dear because I am not able to give you answer of your questions

5 0

3 years ago

method of interacting with others respectfully, courteously and with _____________ in the office or workplace.

creativ13 [48]

Answer:

dignity?

Explanation:

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Speculation, hearsay, relevance are examples<br> of valid objections.<br> True or false

Tresset [83]

Answer:

false

Explanation:

because a statement is not hearsay if the word spoken are relevant not what the words mean

6 0

3 years ago

Dany is an international trader in computer. In June 2018 he wrote a proposal to his most frequent client, Alan, saying that he

Zanzabum

Answer to the following question is as follows;

⇒ The Legality of Danny's Proposal;

In this case, Danny's proposal is regarded an offer until it is approved by Alan in the market. As Danny's promised to sell 100 motorcycles for US$1000 each.
The proposal from Danny's perspective is an offer since Alan did not acknowledge the agreement in the beginning. Once acknowledged by Allen, this exchanging of bikes becomes an offer.

⇒ Allan's response;

Allan's response, on the other hand, was interpreted as offer and acceptance because no agreement was reached among them and Allan takes the bike only when it is in good shape.
If the bikes are not in excellent condition, Allen has the right to decline the seller's contract at any moment.

Learn more about "Legal proposal"

brainly.com/question/13460236?referrer=searchResults

8 0

3 years ago