Should Congress have the power to refuse to vote on a justice nominee? Why or why not?

Law

1 answer:

Shkiper50 [21]3 years ago

6 0

Answer:

It is the duty of Congress to have hearings in order to confirm a Supreme Court Justice nominee (as stated in the Constitution). This exclusive power rests on the U.S. Senate. The consensus, however, may be different and may vote against a nominee. Political parties within the Senate generally get in the way of who will vote and who won't, and vice-versa.

Explanation:

For example, Merrick Garland (former President Obama's nominee) was not given a hearing. Furthermore, Congress failed to perform the duties to have a hearing and decide whether to vote or deny a nominee. This is an example of how they refused to even vote on him. This is not the way government should operate.

You might be interested in

What is the law that protects poor service delivery

sergey [27]

Answer:

Consumer Protection Act

Explanation:

Protects the consumer against poor service delivery.

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Why are there only human and civil rights for only PEOPLE of color and not WHITE people? How come AMERICA IS SO DIVERSE we can n

Irina-Kira [14]

Answer:

Because America is the land of the free.

America is so diverse Because there are so many immigrants from all over the world.

8 0

3 years ago

Which of the following is not part of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act? a. financial statement disclosure requirements b. requi

olga nikolaevna [1]

Answer:

a. financial statement disclosure requirements

d. requirement of monitoring contracts with foreign agents

Explanation:

The Foreign Corrupt Practices Act was an act that was passed in 1977 and received two amendments in 1988 and 1998. The act aims to prohibit companies and their officers from influencing foreign officials with payments and rewards - bribery. The act also has a series of accounting requirements that are designed to ensure that shareholders have an accurate view of the company’s finances.

5 0

3 years ago

Neal, a twelve-year-old, buys a pair of skis from Outdoor Outfitters (OO), telling the salesperson that he has never been skiing

gtnhenbr [62]

Answer:

OO could use the defense that they gave advice but it was rather the action of the boy that caused the accident not the other way around.

Explanation:

5 0

3 years ago

Suppose a state legislator proposed a bill to limit the amount of time a law enforcement officer would be allowed to go undercov

nata0808 [166]

Answer:

Undercover work can be extremely dangerous, not only physically, but even mentally. Though it's not often, some UC's start believing they are the person they're playing. They might get too focused on their roles, and it could cause a lot of psychological damage to be undercover for so long. Also, there are physical risks of being undercover, especially if said cover is blown.

Explanation:

8 0

3 years ago