1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Naddik [55]
3 years ago
7

What makes working in a trade special and What do you think might be the pros and cons of working in a trade?

Law
1 answer:
Slav-nsk [51]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

Well I am going into a trade. You can always use your knowledge for your advantage, like for instance you do breaks at your job and on your personal car your brakes go out you could buy the parts and replace it yourself without spending more money on someone else doing the labor. And the same thing goes with plumbing or electrical.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Which ethical system or systems most reflect the thinking used by the court in this case
Marina CMI [18]

Answer:

27) define normative ethics as “theories of ethics that are concerned with the norms, standards or criteria that define principles of ethical behaviour.” The most common examples of normative ethical theories are utilitarianism, Kantian duty-based ethics (deontology), and divine command theory, which are described ...

6 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Challenges of separation of power
Scrat [10]
In several Supreme Court decisions this decade, the question of whether a constitutional attack on a statute should be considered “as applied” to the actual facts of the case before the Court or “on the face” of the statute has been a difficult preliminary issue for the Court. The issue has prompted abundant academic discussion. Recently, scholars have noted a preference within the Roberts Court for as-applied constitutional challenges. However, the cases cited as evidence for the Roberts Court’s preference for as-applied challenges all involve constitutional challenges which concede the legislative power to enact the provision but nevertheless argue for unconstitutionality because the statute intrudes upon rights or liberties protected by the Constitution. Of course, this is not the only type of constitutional challenge to a statute; some constitutional challenges attack the underlying power of the legislative branch to pass the statute in question. Modern scholarship, however, as well as the Supreme Court, has mostly ignored the difference between these two different types of constitutional challenges to statutes when discussing facial and as-applied constitutional challenges. In glossing over this difference, considerations which fundamentally affect whether a facial or as-applied challenge is appropriate have gone unnoticed. By clearly distinguishing between these two very different types of constitutional challenges, and the respective role of a federal court in adjudicating each of these challenges, a new perspective can be gained on the exceedingly difficult question of when a facial or as-applied challenge to a statute is appropriate. In this Article, I argue that federal courts are constitutionally compelled to consider the constitutionality of a statute on its face when the power of Congress to pass the law has been challenged. Under the separation of powers principles enunciated in I.N.S. v. Chadha and Clinton v. New York, federal courts are not free to ignore the “finely wrought” procedures described in the Constitution for the creation of federal law by “picking and choosing” constitutional applications from unconstitutional applications of the federal statute, at least when the statute has been challenged as exceeding Congress’s enumerated powers in the Constitution. The separation of powers principles of I.N.S. and Clinton, which preclude a “legislative veto” or an executive “line item veto,” should similarly preclude a “judicial application veto” of a law that has been challenged as exceeding Congress’s Constitutional authority.
6 0
3 years ago
Discuss THREE contributing factors that led to human rights violation that you have chosen<br>​
Roman55 [17]
Poverty, lack of education, and lack of law enforcement.
3 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
(6) Match the columns :
rosijanka [135]

2----------------------------------------1

6 0
3 years ago
A debt issued by a company as a negotiable instrument with a term of 9 months or less is a security that is exempt from registra
Tomtit [17]
The answer would be B
7 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • 8. What is the process of identifying psychological and social characteristics surrounding the crime as well as the manner in wh
    15·2 answers
  • The procedure in which the prosecutor and defense adorney question potential jurors to pick a jury is known as which of the foll
    15·2 answers
  • What will happen to you if you break the law in north korea?
    12·1 answer
  • Hey guys just wanted to know if Yall can help me to know something, so I was on a soccer game and a kid pushed me on purpose and
    9·2 answers
  • "Democratization of rights" can best be explained as___.
    9·2 answers
  • Communication is not protected if unpatriotic, defiant, or disrespectful.<br> True or false
    6·2 answers
  • Will the police be given less money if defunded
    14·2 answers
  • Cuales son los elementos esenciales del delito?
    12·1 answer
  • Please help (For MUN)
    15·1 answer
  • Write a couple of paragraph about an interesting dream that you have had​
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!