<span>Hypotheses generally (although not always) follow an "If-then" format. This eliminates the first and fourth choices. Of the other two, the second choice (regarding cold weather and tires) can still be tested and verified. The third statement, regarding the end of WWII, is a statement that can't be verified to any appreciable extent and can only go on eyewitness testimony and historical testimony, so it fails the scientific method test.</span>
Children in late childhood are more likely than children in early childhood to compare themselves with their peers, this occurs around the age of five and eight, due to the greater development of friendships and socialization.
The construction of self-knowledge in childhood is impacted by the socialization process that children learn from their parents and institutions where they live, such as school.
The social group of peers corresponds to a group with similar characteristics, such as age, interests and social status, so in late childhood the physical and emotional attributes are more perceived and generate comparison.
Therefore, the comparison with peers starts at the end of childhood, and it is a normal behavior, as there is greater learning about friendship, identification and social perspective on their actions.
Learn more here:
brainly.com/question/24023212
The correct answer is love and belonging
Explanation: Love and Belonging are needs for affection, belonging to a group and acceptance.
Answer: Analyzing your issue/event in diversity exposes the mind to other possibilities than just a particular possibility, it makes you consider what might likely happen should the situation be altered
Explanation:
Viewing an analysis from various perspective and viewing it from a particular perspective is always different. Viewing it from various perspective would have your mind open towards other possibilities that may arise, and how to go about them, but analyzing from a particular view would have your mind closed to just that perspective and ignore other possibilities which might cost you in the future.
Analyzing your issue/event in diversity exposes the mind to other possibilities than just a particular possibility, it makes you consider what might likely happen should the situation be altered