How is a representative democracy similar to a constitutional monarchy?

2 answers:

6 0

A representative democracy is similar to a constitutional monarchy because power in both governments is limited.

A representative democracy is when the people are allowed to vote for their leaders to serve for them in the government such as electing the President. A constitutional monarchy is when a monarch is held back by the law and Parliament.

frutty [35]3 years ago

4 0

They both have limoited power

You might be interested in

Which if the following is a conservative viewpoint

viktelen [127]

There are no statements listed but there are several examples of conservative viewpoints. They believe in personal responsibility. They are against big government especially in business and economics. They support empowerment of individuals to find their own solutions and they preserve values and traditions.

5 0

3 years ago

Select three options

horrorfan [7]

B is right answer born in us you are citizens

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Qual e o nome do primeiro presidente dod estados unidos

Mkey [24]

Answer:

George Washington é o primeiro presidente dos Estados Unidos

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Your task is to write a fictional newspaper story assuming that the Declaration of Independence was never written. Assume that t

slava [35]

Answer:

The complaints chosen were: Not able to trade freely and Unfair taxes.

Explanation:

Open letter to readers

Our country is hundreds of years old, our territory is rich, rich, productive and efficient. Our people are honest, hardworking and ready to take care of their own destiny, their own business and their own prosperity. Amidst all these admirable qualities I wonder: how long will we be subjected to the British abuses that prevent our nation from moving forward.

We are a captive people, as we have no control over our own resources, which have been exploited dishonestly by the British for years. First of all, we must stress that England forbids us to freely negotiate our products, produced and built, planted and harvested by us. This keeps us at the mercy of the English trade, which believes that it has the right to price our work in a way that reduces us and leaves us dependent on England.

We are not a dependent people and we have to reaffirm our supremacy over our products and our autonomy to do business as we see fit.

Not satisfied, England decided to enrich our costs by charging abusive and totally unjust taxes, which are not transformed into services for us but for them. As a result, england is increasingly educated and structured, while we do not have the financial resources to improve education, transportation, communication and countless socioeconomic issues in our country.

This makes me ask you, readers: How long will we accept this type of administration? Will we have to wait thousands of years? Haven't we already been harmed enough by this petty nation? Shouldn't we fight for our defense?

3 0

3 years ago

Why did the South think that the election of Lincoln in 1860 meant that their lives would be different?

Andreas93 [3]

When he got the nomination from the anti-slavery Republican Party in 1860, the South was very concerned. The South had made up its mind. They believed Lincoln would end slavery. However, if they would have listened closely to Lincoln, he had said if he could keep the country together by keeping slavery, he would do so.
And

For the most part, states in the South reacted with anger to Lincoln's victory in the election of 1860. The major issue of the 1860 presidential election was slavery. For Southerners, expanding slavery was the critical issue. Slavery was so pressing that the Democratic party put forth two candidates.

7 0

3 years ago