1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Rzqust [24]
3 years ago
9

Plz answer ASAP

History
2 answers:
Alexandra [31]3 years ago
8 0
A. Rule of law I think!
AnnyKZ [126]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

A: The rule of law!

Explanation:

Rule of law means that everyone is treated equally under the law & that no one is exempt from it.

You might be interested in
What "war" developed between the two Superpowers as a result of World War II?
Lelechka [254]

Answer:

The cold war

Explanation:

One superpower was America, the other was Russia

6 0
3 years ago
What happened to the town of Pompeii in 79 A.D.? A.. A devastating flood swept through the town, washing people and buildings aw
sertanlavr [38]
Pompeii <span>was mostly destroyed and buried under 4 to 6 m of volcanic ash and pumice in the eruption of Mount Vesuvius in </span><span>AD 79.

</span><span> D.The volcano Vesuvius erupted, burying the town and its people in ash.</span>
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Describe the economic hardships that germany suffered in the time period after World War I. What was the political effect of the
nekit [7.7K]
During World War I, Germany had been blockaded, so they didn't have the fertilizer for their crops and the food to survive, which then led to deaths.  After the war, Germany was just really inefficient, and they had major problems.  These problems then led to Hitler becoming the tyrant of Germany, which then led to World War II because he blamed all of the problems on the Jewish people, which then made even more problems.  
8 0
3 years ago
Describe how electoral votes are allocated to the states and how they are allocated to the presidential candidates based on the
MatroZZZ [7]

Answer:

In America, the presidential election system is not through the direct vote of the citizenry, but through the indirect election carried out by the Electoral College. Thus, each voting citizen gives his cast to a specific candidate, but said will must be endorsed by the electors of his state in the Electoral College.

In this regard, each state has the number of voters equal to the number of congressmen it has in the federal Congress. Thus, for example, states like Montana or Alaska have 3 electors (since they have 2 senators and 1 representative), while California has 55.

The problem is that, to determine the electoral votes of each candidate, it has been established that whoever wins the popular votes in the state takes all the votes of the electors of that state (except in the case of Maine and Nebraska). For this reason, it may happen that a candidate in California defeats his opponent 50.1% to 49.9%, in what would be almost a technical tie, but takes 100% of the electoral votes. Thus, the right of citizens to the election of their representatives is violated, and a candidate who has not obtained the majority of the popular vote (as happened in 2016 with Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton) could win in the Electoral College.

Thus, many candidates adopt the strategy of campaigning and giving all their effort in the states with the largest number of voters such as California, Texas, Florida or New York, leaving aside other states considered less important.

4 0
4 years ago
Answer now for brainliest, plz deadline 10 minutes
frosja888 [35]

The correct answer is D; People that are under arrest must be read their rights by law enforcement.

Further Explanation:

When a person is arrested, no matter the age, they must be read their Miranda rights. This informs the person being arrested that they have the right to remain silent and that they can have an attorney. If the person being arrested is not read their Miranda rights, the charges can be dismissed in a trial.

Any type of confession that is given without the rights being read can void that confession in a court of law. The Supreme Court ruled in this case in 1966.

Learn more about Miranda Rights at brainly.com/question/3587626

#LearnwithBrainly

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • New deal regulation of the banking industry resulted in creation of
    15·1 answer
  • A newspaper publishers an article for attacking in American politician, accusing him of taking bribes blackmailing police office
    8·1 answer
  • How does Hector’s response to his wife give us insight into the Greek heroic ideal of arête,
    6·1 answer
  • Who led revolts against the liang dynasty?
    11·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELP I NEED HELP WITH THIS QUESTION
    5·1 answer
  • What man is responsible for creating the idea for assembly-line production, which drove down the cost of manufactured goods?
    6·2 answers
  • help!!!!! will give 100 points Submit your 750-word case study on one of a U.S. Supreme Court case that involves either the Four
    14·1 answer
  • As a result of industrialization in the 1880s, there was rapid growth in Britain’s first industrialized city of
    8·1 answer
  • Please answer my question
    6·2 answers
  • Identify five aspects of Norse Myth that connect with Viking and Norse culture.
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!