1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
finlep [7]
3 years ago
8

Which president of the u.s. signed the declaration of surrener of the vietnam war and when?

History
1 answer:
ira [324]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

Pres. Richard Nixon

Explanation:

In Paris, Pres. Richard Nixon signed a Peace Treaty in 27 January 1973 after rounds of Peace talks between the North Vietnam, South Vietnam and the White House. An agreement was made including ceasing fire, releasing of P.O.W.s, etc.

Then the American troops were withdrawn from South Vietnam. The war continued until 30 April 1975 with the Fall of Saigon, when the country was reunited under communism.

You might be interested in
Match each item with the correct statement below. Column A 1. a process for removing impurities from crude iron: a process for r
Nady [450]

Answer:

1. a process for removing impurities from crude iron

Pudding

2. Mexican priest who led native people in a revolt against Spanish rule

Miguel Hidalgo

3. created the dual monarchy of Austria-Hungary

Compromise of 1867

4. initiated reforms in Mexican government, including redistribution of land to the poor

Benito Juarez

5. the practice of representing real life without idealization in art and literature

Realism

6 0
3 years ago
What strategy did world leaders use to prevent future international conflicts
wlad13 [49]

Answer:

I think D

Explanation:

:)

7 0
3 years ago
What was the impact and/or relationship between Jim Crow laws / Jim Crow Era and the
lina2011 [118]

Answer:

In September 1895, Booker T. Washington, the head of the Tuskegee Institute in Alabama, stepped to the podium at the Atlanta Cotton States Exposition and implored white employers to “cast down your bucket where you are” and hire African Americans who had proven their loyalty even throughout the South’s darkest hours. In return, Washington declared, southerners would be able to enjoy the fruits of a docile work force that would not agitate for full civil rights. Instead, blacks would be “In all things that are purely social . . . as separate as the fingers.”

Washington called for an accommodation to southern practices of racial segregation in the hope that blacks would be allowed a measure of economic freedom and then, eventually, social and political equality. For other prominent blacks, like W. E. B. Du Bois who had just received his PhD from Harvard, this was an unacceptable strategy since the only way they felt that blacks would be able to improve their social standing would be to assimilate and demand full citizenship rights immediately.

Regardless of which strategy one selected, it was clear that the stakes were extremely high. In the thirty years since the Civil War ended African Americans had experienced startling changes to their life opportunities. Emancipation was celebrated, of course, but that was followed by an intense debate about the terms of black freedom: who could buy or sell property, get married, own firearms, vote, set the terms of employment, receive an education, travel freely, etc. Just as quickly as real opportunities seemed to appear with the arrival of Reconstruction, when black men secured unprecedented political rights in the South, they were gone when northern armies left in 1877 and the era of Redemption began. These were the years when white Southerners returned to political and economic power, vowing to “redeem” themselves and the South they felt had been lost. Part of the logic of Redemption revolved around controlling black bodies and black social, economic, and political opportunities. Much of this control took the form of so-called Jim Crow laws—a wide-ranging set of local and state statutes that, collectively, declared that the races must be segregated.

In 1896, the year after Washington’s Atlanta Cotton Exposition speech, the Supreme Court declared in Plessy v. Ferguson that racial segregation was constitutional. It would take fifty-eight years for that decision to be reversed (in Brown v. Board of Education). In the meantime, African Americans had to negotiate the terms of their existence through political agitation, group organizing, cultural celebration, and small acts of resistance. Much of this negotiation can be seen in the history of the Great Migration, that period when blacks began to move, generally speaking, from the rural South to the urban North. In the process, African Americans changed the terms upon which they exercised their claims to citizenship and rights as citizens.

There are at least two factual aspects of the Great Migration that are important to know from the start: 1) the black migration generally occurred between 1905 and 1930 although it has no concrete beginning or end and 2) from the standpoint of sheer numbers, the Great Migration was dwarfed by a second migration in the 1940s and early 1950s, when blacks became a majority urban population for the first time in history. Despite these caveats, the Great Migration remains important in part because it marked a fundamental shift in African American consciousness. As such, the Great Migration needs to be understood as a deeply political act.

Migration was political in that it often reflected African American refusal to abide by southern social practices any longer. Opportunities for southern blacks to vote or hold office essentially disappeared with the rise of Redemption, job instability only increased in the early twentieth century, the quality of housing and education remained poor at best, and there remained the ever-looming threat of lynch law if a black person failed to abide by local social conventions. Lacking even the most basic ability to protect their own or their children’s bodies, blacks simply left.

3 0
3 years ago
Where is the main cause of why there is poor soil in the sub Saharan Africa?
mr Goodwill [35]

Answer: Soil in Sub Saharan Africa is poor because

a) it is often overworked and undernourished

b) farmers sometimes don't have enough money to maintain it

Hope this helps!

6 0
3 years ago
1. How do the two arguments explain the deforestation of the island?
Simora [160]
WOW!? That's a lot of questions....:(
3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • 33 degree south 18 degree east
    14·1 answer
  • PLEASEEEEEEEEE HELPPPPPP. 95 POINTS PLUS BRAINLIEST.
    9·2 answers
  • How did the purpose and structure of the federal government under the
    13·1 answer
  • The ancient lndian language was called
    5·2 answers
  • How was raegan different from nixon​
    8·1 answer
  • The five themes of geography include location, place, movement, region, and __________.
    11·2 answers
  • How were the Aztecs defeated by the Spaniards
    5·1 answer
  • Why are voting issues important for citizens to understand?
    15·1 answer
  • What is the color of pakistan flag
    15·2 answers
  • What are the disadvantage of using venezuela currency?
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!