1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
lapo4ka [179]
3 years ago
10

What was true of the differences between the North and South after 1820?

History
2 answers:
aniked [119]3 years ago
7 0
One thing that was true of the differences between the North and South after 1820 was that "<span>c. The North was becoming more urban and industrial," since the South's climate was much more conducive to large-scale agriculture. </span>
3241004551 [841]3 years ago
4 0

The correct option would be C: The North was becoming more urban and industrial.

Industry flourished, fueled by more abundant natural resources than in the south, and many large cities were established. By 1860, one quarter of all Northeners lived in urban areas. Slavery had died out, replaced in the cities and factories by immigrant labour from Europe.

In fact, an overwhelming majority of immigrants settled in the North rather than the South. Transport was easier in the North.

Far more Northerners than Southerners belonged to the Whig/Republican political party and they were far more likely to have careers in business , medicine or education. In fact, an engineer was far more likely to be from the North than from the South. Northern children were more prone to attend school than Southern children.

You might be interested in
QUESTION 66
gizmo_the_mogwai [7]
B. South Texas
due to the fact of the coastal area and the border which creates a economic Core Area
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Who fought in the French and Indian War? Why?​
sergejj [24]

Answer: Great Britain and France

Explanation: The French and Indian War began over the specific issue of whether the upper Ohio River valley was a part of the British Empire, and therefore open for trade and settlement by Virginians and Pennsylvanians, or part of the French Empire.

7 0
3 years ago
In the 1960s, Native Americans were angry about the violence directed against them. They were also upset that the government
Kaylis [27]

In the 1960s, Native Americans were angry about the violence directed against them. They were also upset that the government  seemed to be ignoring the poverty and other social problems among their peoples. For these and other reasons, they started the American Indian Movement.

Answer: Option C

<u>Explanation:</u>

The American Indian movement was started in the year of 1968 by the leaders of the group of American Indian. This movement  was started by the people because the treatment of the white people and the government of the United States of America was not just and fair.

So to stand up for their rights and have an equal position in the society, this movement was started against brutality against the native Americans. They also wanted the government to remove poverty from their tribe.

3 0
4 years ago
Consider the benefits and negative effects of imperialism in Africa and Asia in the late 19th and early 20th centuries. Discuss
Ksju [112]

The imperialism in Africa and Asia by the European countries had long lasting effects in big portions of these two continents, some being positive and some being negative.

The positive impacts were that the European imperialists built a lot of infrastructure in the countries they controlled. They also allowed the locals to be able to learn the Western ways of functioning, diplomacy, politics, the way their economy works. Multiple industries were developed, or at least the basics for them were set.

The negative impacts were the usage of the resources of the countries for the purpose of the European motherlands, thus taking the profit out of those countries. The borders set by the Europeans were in accordance to their interests, not the local populations, which created a very big problem further on when those countries gained independence, and lot of different ethnic groups and different religions found themselves in the same borders.

It is hard to evaluate which impact outweighing because there has been some countries that used very well the things that the Europeans left and thought them (China and Thailand for example), while others went into a direction to destroy everything the Europeans left and thought them (Zimbabwe and DR Congo for example).

5 0
3 years ago
How does the rule of law affect the actions of the government?
Nataly [62]

answer:

Courts have the responsibility to interpret the Constitution's meaning, as well as the meaning of any laws passed by Congress

Explanation:

looked it up sorry

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How did legal challenges contribute to the decline of Reconstruction?
    5·2 answers
  • What is the best evidence to support that an occluded front is occurring?
    5·1 answer
  • What is most likely the allegorical meaning of the story?
    5·1 answer
  • What conclusions did Lewis and Clark come to about the Louisiana Territory following their trip?
    13·1 answer
  • after general howe forces defeated the Americans at BrooklynHeights in White Plains Washington strategy called for
    5·1 answer
  • Which of the following describes a major difference between the united states and the soviet union during the cold war?
    8·1 answer
  • Which country has the largest GDP in South America?
    5·2 answers
  • The Egyptian pharaoh ____ the Israelites
    11·1 answer
  • Which of the following was a new challenge for Italy after unification?
    12·1 answer
  • I would like some help
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!