Ask question

Ask question

All categories

3 years ago

9

Automobile insurance companies have a problem with people who buy insurance and then drive recklessly or take less care to avoid

losses after being insured. in other words, the automobile insurance market is subject to

1 answer:

Sergio039 [100]3 years ago

4 0

I think the proper term is "moral hazard"

You might be interested in

Ben is exhausting his money income consuming products A and B in such quantities that MUa/Pa = 6 and MUb/Pb = 4. Ben should purc

yaroslaw [1]

Answer:

Option (a) is correct.

Explanation:

Given the marginal utility per dollar for the two products as follows:

$\frac{MU_{a} }{P_{a} } =6$

$\frac{MU_{b} }{P_{b} } =4$

All the individuals wants to maximize their utility that is obtained from the consumption of goods. We can see that marginal utility per dollar of product A is higher than the marginal utility per dollar of product B which means that this consumer should purchase more quantity of product A and less quantity of product B.

It is going on until the point at which marginal utility per dollar of both the products becomes equal.

6 0

3 years ago

you are billed $300 at 5% simple interest for 2 years but given an opportunity to pay only 3% compound interest for 2 years. Whi

balandron [24]

This question is a bit tricky to answer because it does not state how often interest rate is applied so lets say for the simple 5% interest rate the rate of interest was calculated after 2 years you would pay a total interest of $15 since interest was only calculated once but for the 3% calculating every year with compound it would be a total of 18.27 dollars in interest but then you would have to calculate the 5% simple interest the same way which would total to $30 if calculated once a year being more than the 3% compound. But lets say interest is calculated once a month your total for the 5% simple interest would be $360 dollars interest for those 2 years and the 3% compound would be $406.97 dollars in interest. So over all the less amount of times interest compounds the less interest there is making it more worth than the simple but if the compounding occurs more frequently the simple 5% interest is more worth it. In this situation I think it might just be yearly interest which makes the 3% compound more worth taking for this short amount of time.

6 0

3 years ago

Brian vargo, an auto repair mechanic who remains unemployed because he refuses to work for less than $1,000 an hour, is:

Verizon [17]

The answer is he is not part of the labor force. Since the labor force is comprises of the employed and the unemployed. The remainder— persons who are neither employed nor unemployed are not in the labor force. This group comprises retired persons, students, those taking care of children or other family members, and others who are neither working nor seeking work. Since the mid-1990s, naturally fewer than 1 in 10 people not in the labor force stated that they want a job.

3 0

3 years ago

Nervous Norman holds 70% of his assets in cash, earning 0%, and 30% of his assets in an insured savings account, earning 2%. The

elena-14-01-66 [18.8K]

Answer: 0.6%

Explanation:

The expected return is a weighted average of the returns of the assets invested in.

70% is invested in cash which earns 0%

30% is in a savings account earning 2%

Expected return = (70% * 0%) + (30% * 2%)

= 0% + 0.6%

= 0.6%

6 0

3 years ago

Cardinal Industries purchased a generator that cost $11,000. It has an estimated life of five years and a residual value of $1,0

bagirrra123 [75]

Answer:

$11,000 cost, five-year life, and $1,000 salvage value

Explanation:

given data

cost = $11,000

residual value = $1,000

estimated to be good = 5,000 hour

solution

as per the straight-line method

formula to compute the depreciation expense that is express as

depreciation expense = (Purchase value of generator - residual value) ÷ (estimated useful life) .......................1

and

here by considering here these three item

and other information that is not relevant that ignore

depreciation expense = ($11,000 - $1,000) ÷ 5 years = 2000

so $11,000 cost, five-year life, and $1,000 salvage value

3 0

3 years ago