Flash back to show Rapunzel in the forest imagining what the prince was doing without her. A dream sequence could be the mother imagining what Rapunzel would taste like, or how the King imagines what Rapunzel looks like.
<u>Explanation:</u>
You could use the flash back to show Rapunzel in the forest imagining what the prince was doing without her. Such as, "Rapunzel sat in the dark forest. Though she had two children, she was completely alone. She began knitting a new pair of socks for her children, and humming an old familiar tune. She though back to how it all began." and then switch back and forth between the beginning and her waiting. A dream sequence could be the mother imagining what the Rapunzel would taste like, or how the King imagines what Rapunzel looks like.
Flash forward would be the opposite of a flash back. In stead of thinking about what happened, you think about what will happen. Like from the witch's perspective. She knows what is going to happen before it happens. You cold have the first meeting between the father and the witch, and when the father takes the Rapunzel back to his wife, you flash forward to the witch telling Rapunzel to let her hair down.
I guess a better example would be to show the witch convincing the father to give Rapunzel to him. You could flash forward (the witch showing the father) what would happen if the mother didn't eat the Rapunzel. "The witch then pulled an old mirror from her satchel and told the father to look in to it. He saw himself crying while his wife and unborn child died because he was unable to bring the Rapunzel to her" This would be making the Rapunzel magical, though.
I think the answer would be C. Park, harsh
I thin that the answer is Wei-Chen.
Answer:
Hello, I believe the answer is if pyramus had left at the same time as Thisbe, he might have seen that she was not killed by the lion.
When analyzing any literary work, be it a full text, an excerpt, or any document, for that matter, one way, or one technique that can be used is the analysis of a cause-effect, or causal relationship. Basically, this technique allows the critic to discover the links that exist between a situation, or an event, that takes place and the consequences that derive from said cause. It is almost like tracing a pattern backwards that explains why an action, or a result, happened. In order then for the reader, or critic to use this technique, he/she must take into consideration a series of things:
A: Describe the characters´ actions from past events. This is because, when you discover the past events, you can find an explanation and a link with the action realized and you can understand the sequence in the story.
B: Identify the cause of the action or event. This is a more direct pathway, as it establishes the direct link between cause and effect. In the first option, background history will explain in some form why a character acts in a certain way, but it may not always be the only cause. However, when you find the direct cause of an action, you find this causality.
D: Consider the effect of the action of event. By doing this you are continuing the process that is necessary to establish a cause and effect relationship. It gives you the full picture and the full understanding of the how, when, and why and also of the outcomes. It is almost like the finishing touch to unraveling the mystery in a story.
