Step-by-step explanation:
Force = pressure * area
= 200 * 3.7
= 740 N
The inequality that can be used to determine x is 
<u />
<h3>How to generate the inequality</h3>
<u>Given data</u>
Rental company charge per day = $31.91
Rental company charge per mile driven = $0.07
Hudson plans to drive 100 miles
Hudson has at most $70
solution
let x represent he maximum number of days Hudson can afford to rent while staying on budget. cost of number of days is:
$31.91 * x= 31.91x
As Hudson plans to ride 100 miles; cost is:
100 * 0.07 = $7
therefore number of days plus 100 miles ride is:
31.91x + 7
with a limit of less than or equal to the budget we have:

The inequality above could be used to determine x
Read more on inequality here: brainly.com/question/11613554
#SPJ1
Answer:
the sum is 5
Step-by-step explanation:
The best design for this experiment would be a repeated measures design. This is ideal to determine if eating an apple makes you healthy.
<h3>What is an experimental design?</h3>
An experimental design refers to the general structure of an experiment including how people are distributed into the control and experimental group to test a specific phenomenon.
<h3>What is a repeated measures design?</h3>
In a repeated measures design all participants are both parts of the control group, in this case, people who do not eat apples, and the experimental group, or people who eat apples.
<h3>What does this design imply?</h3>
In the case of determining if eating an apple every day, this design implies:
- All participants will be asked to not eat apples every day for a specific period such as one or two months, and health levels will be measured during this time.
- After the first step, all participants will be asked to eat an apple every day during the period, and their health will be measured.
- The researcher can compare the results of each participant, which is more accurate than comparing one participant to another.
Learn more about experiments in: brainly.com/question/1452319
Complete Question
The complete question is shown on the first uploaded image
Answer:
The decision is to <u>reject</u> the <u> null hypothesis</u> at a significant level of <u>significance </u>
There is <u>sufficient </u> evidence to conclude that <u>at least one of the population mean</u> is <u>different from</u> <u>at least of the population</u>
Step-by-step explanation:
From the question we are told that the claim is
The mean growth rates of all four species are equal.
The null hypothesis is

Th alternative hypothesis is

From question the p-value is 
And since the
so the null hypothesis will be rejected
So
The decision is to <u>reject</u> the <u> null hypothesis</u> at a significant level of <u>significance </u>
There is <u>sufficient </u> evidence to conclude that <u>at least one of the population mean</u> is <u>different from</u> <u>at least of the population</u>