Rhonda is interested in putting money toward a timeshare estate, which would allow her to use a condominium for two weeks each year. Timeshare estates <u>can be sold or passed down to heirs</u>.
A timeshare is a shared ownership version of holiday actual property wherein more than one purchaser very own allotments of utilization, usually in single-week increments, in equal assets. The timeshare model may be carried out to many specific types of residences, which include holiday accommodations, condominiums, apartments, and campgrounds.
Basically, timeshare inheritance is bundled in with other property assets an heir stands to get hold of. Some timeshare contracts have a perpetuity clause, which basically means the timeshare identify is owned forever and is blanketed within the unique owner's estate (and consequently surpassed directly to their inheritors).
There are two fundamental sorts of timeshares: (1) the proprietor of the unit truly owns a piece of the actual property and (2) the owner of the unit has rent or the right to apply the unit for the required time. If you own a unit of a condominium for every week, then your very own actual estate.
Learn more about Timeshare estates here brainly.com/question/25658352
#SPJ4
If a $1,000 increase in income leads to an $800 increase in consumption expenditures, then marginal propensity to consume is 0.8.
Given that a $1,000 increase in income leads to an $800 increase in consumption expenditures.
We are required to find the marginal propensity to consume.
Marginal propensity to consume is the ratio of increase in consumption and the increase in income. It is also known as MPC.
MPC=ΔC/ΔI
ΔC=Change in consumption
ΔI= Change in income.
MPC=800/1000
=0.8
Hence if a $1,000 increase in income leads to an $800 increase in consumption expenditures, then marginal propensity to consume is 0.8.
Learn more about marginal propensity to consume at brainly.com/question/17930875
#SPJ4
Answer:
The correct answer is National Service Provider.
Explanation:
The networks of Internet service providers could be considered as a super set of business networks, especially large corporations. The big difference is that a bank has to attend only to the traffic requirements between the networks of its own offices, while an ISP serves hundreds, thousands or millions of different clients, and it is important to guarantee the "tightness" of the various groups , so that they don't see each other directly, and in turn, everyone can access the Internet.
Answer:
The answer is: C) The minimum price sellers are willing to accept to sell an extra unit of a good.
Explanation:
A normal supply curve should move upward from left to right. The expresses the Law of Supply: (given that all other factors remain without change) As the price of a product increases, the quantity supplied should also increase.
For example:
An ounce of gold costs right now $1,500 and 100 ounces of gold are being traded right now at that price. If a new buyer comes in and wants to buy the 101th ounce of gold, then following a normal supply curve, the new buyer would need to pay more for that extra ounce of gold, maybe $1,510.
What the supply curve shows us is that given a certain price Y, a company will be willing to sell X amount of goods. The more demand a product has (X + 1) > X, then the price Y will increase until a new balance is found.
Answer:
A. Two alternatives
Explanation:Alternative one : not to do anything, and run the risk of losing entire crop worth of $75,000.
Alternative two : to insulate his crop by spraying water at cost of $20,000 and succeed in saving the crop with five possible outcomes as given in attached file.
Net result or expected loss for atternative one is = .40*0 + .6*75000 = $45,000
Net result or expected loss for alternative two is = Cost-20000 + expected loss = 20000 + .3*0 +.15*5000 + .10*1000 +.15*15000 + .30*20000 = 20000+10000 = $30,000
B. Expected loss is less in case of alternative two, therefore farmer is advised to go for spraying water.
C. Highest cost for insulating the crop is (45000 - 10000) = $35,000 (Differnce between the expected loss under the two options)
D. In case the probability of freezing is at the lowest level of .40, then loss under alternative one is = .4*75000 =$30,000 . With higher levels of probabilities the expected loss is bound to be more. Therefore the decision to go for spraying water holds good.
E. As explained earlier as long as cost of insulation is less than the difference between the expected losses between options, it is recommended to go for spraying water.