Answer:
They had no say in whether they would fight in the war or for which side they would fight.
Explanation:
Answer:
This close alliance, which was based on mutual respect and good treatment from both sides, led the Natives to side with the French in their conflicts with the English settlers that came later in the 1600s and into the mid-1700s. Relations between the Natives and the English were not nearly as good.
Hope this helps!!!
I assume that you are talking about security in the sense of police or national defense.
In a pure free market system, you would have no overall police force or army. These things (this kind of security) are called "public goods" because they are things that everyone gets use from. In other words, the army can't protect me without protecting my next-door neighbor. For that reason, there's no way an army could be profitable and so no private company would produce an army (it couldn't tell my neighbor "we'll stop protecting you from the Russians if you don't pay your army bill").
Public goods will only be produced if the government produces them. So security (except for things like private security guards) will not exist in a pure free market economy.
The answer to the question is true
north to south is an axis.
east to west is an equater
British Raj denotes the British rule in India from 1858 and 1947. Though the people suffered greatly in the hands of the British one positive result of their rule was the development in infrastructure, including railroads and communications.
