Napoleon came to power in France through the coup d’etat.
<u>Explanation:</u>
Napoleon came to power in France through the coup d’etat. This move brought an end to the five member directory in France and the French consulate came in its place. This took place on 9 November 1799.
Napoleon had returned to France and was respected due to his victories in the Middle East. A false threat that the Jacobin coup gaining control in Paris was made and the members of the Councils were relocated. Napoleon took charge of the local troops.
Later three members of the Directory were made to resign and the Directory lost quorum. The protests of the two remaining members were suppressed. Military power was then used to suppress further protests and the counsel was formed with Napoleon as the most powerful member in it.
Finally the first French empire came into being.
No, Congress should not have the power to interpret the Constitution. The Constitution of the United States of America states that the legislative branch (including Congress) has the power to MAKE laws. The judicial branch (including the Supreme Court) has the power to INTERPRET laws. By giving the legislative branch the power to interpret the Constitution, you are giving it the powers of the judicial branch. This power must belong only to the judicial branch, NOT to the legislative branch or Congress. (NOTE: I'm not sure if this question is supposed to be a matter of opinion or not--if it is, this is my viewpoint.)
Answer:
Usually, when we hear about World War II, the first thing that comes to mind is: concentration camps, Nazis, Hitler, atomic bombs, blood and destruction; Although all these elements frame the struggle that represents a before and after in humanity, the important factors to maintain the course of the attacks were different. One of them was the battle that the countries involved had with the positions of their population in the face of the conflict, which kept them in a constant effort to keep the heart and mind of the people in victory. Thus, persuading citizens to support the war effort became such an important issue as the production of bullets and airplanes. The objective of propaganda during the war was to expose beliefs with the intention of influencing and convincing the audience, through constant messages, that war was the best and only solution to the world situation. Adopting this belief as their own, and thus rejecting other points of view, posters, brochures, news, radio programs and films were the means on which governments relied to achieve their goal.
All possible help was requested to continue and, of course, win the war, prompting the population to make an extra effort and work harder; the children kept pennies, collected scrap and food waste to be prevented if there was any contingency. With so many men enlisted in the Forces, millions of women worked in factories, buses, trains, hospitals and schools. That is why it is common to find propaganda focused on them, on children and on people who did not go to the battlefield; From the British Political Warfare Executive (PWE), the different Russian newspapers or such iconic elements as “Rosie, the Riveter” of the Office of War Information (OWI), played a key role in continuing the national and economic complications caused by the war in the participating countries.
