Answer:
c. changes in both aggregate demand and aggregate supply.
Explanation:
Aggregate demand which is also known as domestic final demand (DFD) refers to the demand of services and final goods in a specific market. On the other hand, aggregate supply refers to the supply of that service or final good to a specific market. Hence, it is the difference in the aggregate demand and aggregate supply of a product or good or service in a specific market. When the supply is lower than the demand, it automatically leads to inflation. There the option that changes in both aggregate demand and aggregate supply is correct.
Women and children rioted in the south because of lack of money, provisions, and food. Which resulted in the southern bread riots.
The framework could be used by management in its internal control assessment under requirements of SOX is the COSO internal framework.
The COSO Framework is a device used to establish internal controls to be included into business processes. collectively, these controls provide reasonable warranty that the organization is operating ethically, transparently and according with mounted enterprise requirements.The overarching purpose of a COSO Framework is to enhance and enhance organizational performance and oversight, as well as decreasing the quantity of the hazard of fraud.
The 5 components of COSO: C.R.I.M.E. The five components of COSO – control environment, risk evaluation, records and conversation, monitoring sports, and existing control activities – are often referred to through the acronym C.R.I.M.E.
An internal manipulate framework is a structured manual that organizes and categorizes expected controls or manipulate topics. some businesses layout control frameworks for popular functions just like the COSO internal manipulate framework, whilst others are extra specific consisting of the COBIT IT control framework.
Learn more about COSO framework here:-
brainly.com/question/20436236
#SPJ4
Answer:
Charismatic leaders tend to hold power for short durations, and according to Weber, they are just as likely to be tyrannical as they are heroic. Diverse male leaders such as Hitler, Napoleon, Jesus Christ, César Chávez, Malcolm X, and Winston Churchill are all considered charismatic leaders. Because so few women have held dynamic positions of leadership throughout history, the list of charismatic female leaders is comparatively short. Many historians consider figures such as Joan of Arc, Margaret Thatcher, and Mother Teresa to be charismatic leaders.
Explanation:
I found this in an article online I hope this helps
Even though all of the above reasons may be critical pull factors, we could safely lean towards option B, <em>higher wages</em>, as the most indicative answer. Mexicans did not necessarily get better jobs than they had back in their native country, where they may even have been skilled and educated professionals; in fact, wages may have been significantly higher in comparison to their earnings at home, allowing them for having a better quality of life and affording medical care, which tends to be expensive in the USA. Education is not necessarily free -especially at its highest levels, which would help migrants and their offspring to still further improve their quality of life- but then again, higher wages could open the possibility of accessing some private higher education.
