Because the Articles of Confederation created a central government that contained only a legislative branch, it does not reflect the principle<span> of "separation of powers".</span>
In the "person-situation debate" amongst psychologists, Traits are a false notion. People might not behave consistently in all circumstances, thus it would be beneficial to examine how they respond differently in particular circumstances.
<h3>Which side of the person-situation argument did Mischel take?</h3>
In the psychological community's "person-situation argument," Walter Mischel played a significant role. Character traits are a myth. People might not behave consistently in all circumstances, thus it would be useful to examine the various responses in particular circumstances.
<h3>What exactly is the person-situation argument?</h3>
Nature versus. nurture argument in personality psychology concerns which factor, a person or an environment, is more crucial in predicting what people will do. There is too much variation in behavior across contexts for attributes to adequately describe individual variations.
Learn more about psychologists here:-
brainly.com/question/28321133
#SPJ4
I don't know how this is a question, but it is correct.
People who were scared a strong central government and total control (like the experience with Britain), wanted to give states power to counteract the effect. It made people like Thomas Jefferson feel assured that the U.S. would stay a democracy.
Answer:
The government (Legislature)
Explanation:
The citizens have the fundamental right to decide who is going to lead them and basic freedom, in a Democratic system of government, but the legislative arm decides on how the freedom would be used.
