The answer to this is roofs. Hopes it helps
Answer:
See below
Explanation:
Given the above information, the adjusting entry for Chynne will be;
Answer:The answer is 1 B, 2.the giving up of her $50,000 per year job as an accountant, 3.True
Explanation:
The opportunity cost can be define as a sacrifice whether on the side of an individual, a firm or government. The opportunity cost is the forgone alternatives in order to acquire a product or a services. To an individual, who aims at maximizing his utility from his limited available resources he will have to allocate these limited resources to those wants that are most important. Opportunity cost help an individual to make a judicious use of his scarce resources. .The opportunity cost is also important to a firm because the firm has to choose to allocate its limited available raw materials in the production of a particular product with high demand at the expense of other products with low demand in order to maximize profit.
The opportunity cost to the government is in the preparation of the budget, the government can decide to allocate the available resources to the sector of the economy which is of high priority such as education at the expense of other sectors of the economy.
Answer:
Yes because if they are dangerous then they house nt be in market!!!
Explanation:
Answer:
Split Labour Market
Explanation:
Proposed in the 1970s by Edna Bonacich, the Split labor market theory attempts to define the link between race or ethnicity and the segmentation of the labor market. The theory argues that the segmentation of the labor market is more a political and social structures than individual biases in employment.
For instance, depending on the type of job, an employer will determine what class of employees to target. In a job that requires cheap labor with poor health and insurance plans, an employer will favour lower tier workers who are less eager to complain than the upper tier workers who are more concerned about union requirements
The Split labour market theory used this explanation to divide the economy into the upper sector of higher paid workers in more secure jobs and the lower sector of lower-paid workers in less secure jobs.
