For the first one I think it D and for the second one I think it is A, I hope this helps
Answer:
Many of the ideas concerning separation of powers and protection of rights were implemented in the United States.
Explanation:
The 1688 revolution, also known as the glorious revolution, was influenced by political and religious difficulties in the country at that time. It resulted in the dismissal of King James II. It promoted the power of parliament by diminishing the power of the monarchy and influencing the current democratic laws of Great Britain.
After the effects of the glorious revolution, the declaration of the rights of England was drafted, this declaration was intended to establish the duties and rights of the king and citizens, as well as to separate each of the powers.
Following the example of England, when the United States of America proclaimed its independence from Great Britain, it took as an example the declaration of rights of England to draft the Declaration of Independence, which establishes the human rights of the new nation. It also takes as an example of the separation of powers by separately establishing the executive, judicial, and legislative power.
<em>I hope this information can help you.</em>
Answer:
By changing the votes
Explanation:
One guy was in that thing
Answer:
Haiti Earthquake
Locally, many people in their communities were affected by the earthquake and lost their homes. It often forced them to relocate to different cities. they may have to go elsewhere for food or clothes. Regionally, large areas of Haiti were affected and people had to work together to try to rebuild where they lived. People also migrated from region to region withing Haiti trying to find shelter or medical care. Globally, the country was in a state of emergency. The citizens migrated to the Dominican Republic and even to parts of the United States. the earthquake that shook Haiti was heard round the world and numerous countries around the world helped Haiti by offering food and donating money tot he country.
Where do you think the impact of this forced migration has been greatest: at the local, regional, or global level?
The impact of the earthquake that hit Haiti in 2010 and caused forced migration has defiantly been greatest at the global level. It was not just one town that felt the hit or just one region of Haiti. Essentially, it was the entire country that was affected by this natural disaster. Sionce the whole country had been devestated, it has affected other countries in the world as well. They feel obligated to help the country of Haiti, offer assistance, and allow refugees to find new homes in their countries.
This earthquake was devastating for Haiti because it is located right in the middle of the Caribbean Sea and a lot of the regions in Haiti are in very low flood plains. Additionally, many essential things in Haiti were destroyed because of the earthquake including medical facilities, political buildings, telephone poles and more. Many families were forced to sleep on the streets in in shacks that they built because their homes had been destroyed. And many people lost their jobs. Commercial buildings collapsed and business were struggling to keep operating through the chaos and aftermath of the quakes. Furthermore many people fled the country i search of a new home. A great percentage of Haiti's population were forced to migrate to the Dominican Republic and other countries. Not having a home or a job, or needing medical attention were push factors that led to the migration of Haitians to other countries.
Displacement
Impact of forced migration at different spatial levels
Haiti is on an island located right next to the Dominican Republic. On January 12th, 2010 an earthquake measuring 7.5 in magnitude rocked the country, it's epicenter just 16 miles from the capital Port-au-Prince. Within the next few weeks many more aftershocks hi the country. This natural disaster changed the country of Haiti drastically. And many people were forced to migrate.
Explanation:
Answer:
There is no concrete way to know if they had any roast turkey that day, but we do know there were plenty of wild turkeys in the region then, "and both the native Wampanoag Indians and English colonists ate them," writes Curtin in Giving Thanks
Explanation:
