Answer:
pa brainliest answer po follow me follow back and pa heart po thankssssss
Explanation:
no one would have believed in
he last years of the nineteenth century that this world was being watched keenly and closely by intelligences greater than man’s and yet as mortal as his own; that as men busied themselves about their various concerns they were scrutnised and studied, perhaps almost as narrowly as a man with a microscope might scrutinise the transient creatures that swarm and multiply in a drop of water. With infinite complacency men went to and fro over this globe about their little affairs, serene in their assurance of their empire over matter. It is possible that the infusoria under the microscope do the same. No one gave a thought to the older worlds of space as sources of human danger, or thought of them only to dismiss the idea of life upon them as impossible or improbable.
<h3>H.G. Wells, The War of the Worlds</h3>
Answer:
I disagree with this statement.
Explanation:
I disagree with this statement, because I believe that traditional medicine is effective in preventing diseases, especially mental illnesses and those related to stress and anxiety, since traditional medicine uses knowledge and beliefs that may not be based on science.
Conventional medicine, on the other hand, is that used in health systems, which is prescribed by a doctor and based entirely on science, so it is the most effective medicine for curing diseases in my opinion.
Modern drugs have been developed after years of scientific research and effectiveness tests, which attest to their greater likelihood of curing a disease specifically and prolonging an individual's health and well-being.
A relevant example was the discovery of Penicillin, the first antibiotic discovered that motivated the study, investment and development of other antibiotics for several diseases, which helped in the cure and in the life expectancy of people.
The answer is A to your question
It is interpretive, a narrative, a report and its thesis cannot be debated.
