Answer:Explained below
Explanation:
Cindy Should distrust this persuasive appeal because not all the cats are same .In case of Rowena the cat might be hungry so she destroy the home out of hunger or may be she was injured and threatened by other animals .
So Cindy should distrust the persuasive appeal of Rowena as Rowena also don't know the condition of cat.
Answer:
Sharks swallowed and ate the bodies of African slaves that were thrown into the sea.
Explanation:
The middle passage is a stage in the triangular trade where Slaves from the African coasts were carried across the Atlantic ocean to South and North America. In the course of crossing this ocean, some slaves became so weak that they could no longer continue the journey. Some others died from the stress and starvation they experienced in the course of the journey. This set of people were usually thrown into the ocean by their captors and their bodies were readily swallowed by the sharks.
It is believed that some of these sharks followed the ships closely so as to readily grab the opportunity of swallowing the slaves when they were thrown aboard.
Answer:
His parenting style is permissive.
Explanation:
Permissive parents, in psychology, present very low demands but a high level of responsiveness. They do not try to establish rules, and do not expect responsibility or maturity from their kids. Permissive parents perform poorly when it comes to establishing rules, offering guidelines, and punishing misbehavior. They are generally trying to be friends with their children, not wishing to act as authority figures.
Answer:
Reducing trade barriers
Explanation:
<u>If governments choose protectionism, they harm citizens who could benefit from the products, services or jobs offered by foreign companies.</u>
If, for example, the “A” government sets <em>tariffs to protect the domestic market</em>, the “B” government <em>could respond with tariffs in retaliation</em>, which would result in both countries being harmed. So, the problem of trade warfare is still represented by a “Prisoner's Dilemma” game because it says that two people, in this case, two governments, can decide not to cooperate even if it goes against the interest of both.
On the other hand, <em>unrestricted free trade could go against governments that develop trade policies based on national economic well-being.</em>
The game's equilibrium solution would be for both countries to opt to reduce their trade barriers through negotiations.