Answer:
B) The historical argument is credible because it includes a strong claim and evidence from a credible source.
Explanation:
In the text, it says "According to Sarah Brightener, author of The Women's Revolution: How Industrialization Brought Freedom, Women living in cities could earn their own money, and to some extent make their own desistions." It has text evidence from a book. That's why it's credible. It has information from a reliable source.
Note: Hope this Helps!
<em>-kiniwih426</em>
They did everything in their power sides to help them with a little more and more than the other one and
For Rachel the answer is c
The Supreme Court heads the Judicial branch of the U.S government.
Answer:
'Their diet was mainly meat and wild animals.' Hunter Gatherers
'They owned land and property' Farmers
'They depended in domesticated plants and animals for food.' Farmers
'They did not own many things.' Hunter Gatherers
Explanation:
1. Farmers would live off of domesticated animals, not wild.
2. Hunter Gatherers had to gather things, so they most likely wouldn't stay in one place for long. And farmers need land to farm.
3. Farmers tend to not hunt, but keep lifestock.
4. Like what I said about two, they had to go hunt for their food, and owning a bunch of idioms would make on the go trips slow and weigh the person down.
