The best option as to what shift has occurred as a result of the collapse of the Soviet Union is "a shift from government-owned to privately-owned business," although it should be noted that this is a bit of a simplification.
In this case, any value given up by not choosing to
<span> spend or save the money is the "opportunity cost", because the money </span>could be spent elsewhere. "trade offs" and opportunity costs are very similar though in economics.
Yes. I would have supported Hamilton's econimic plan. It was important to get the states on strong economic footing and to get them depend of the federal government.
Answer:
Yes
Explanation:
because it should be given to the rightful owner.
