The reason for which Brinkmanship had been considered a bold, as well as, an aggressive idea would be:
<h3>What is Brinkmanship?</h3>
Brinkmanship is defined as the hunt towards a particular benefit by taking a risk instead of giving up. Brinkmanship is the practice of trying to achieve a profitable outcome by pushing dangerous events on the brink of an ongoing conflict.
This strategy is based on international politics, foreign policy, labor relations, modern military strategy, and high-profile cases.
The idea is considered an aggressive idea because it involves a greater and more dangerous level of risk i.e. "pretending an attack to take the enemy down.'
However, the idea is dangerous but it contains an advantage on the hand if it gets successful.
Thus, option C is the correct answer that is bluffing an enemy into thinking it would be attacked.
To learn more about Brinkmanship, refer:
brainly.com/question/807188
1. The League of Nations lacked enforcement power. It did not have an army or navy at its disposal.
2. All of the answers are possible reasons for appeasement
3. The United States and The Soviet Union.
One of the actions that progressives took to help the poor is highlighting the poor living conditions and exposing corruption which helped inspire legislation at the state and federal level aimed at correcting these ills. They demanded social reforms through demanding for social change such as through journalists
Answer: I believe the answer is A but im not very sure.