In the 19th century, which of these river was an important route for transporting goods from northern states to southern states?

2 answers:

6 0

"There were a number of important routes, but at the time rivers were the most important. The Mississippi, Missouri, Ohio, and Susquehanna rivers were all key modes of transport for northern goods heading to southern states. Several oceanic routes were also used, connecting northern ports like New York and Boston to southern ports like Charleston, Mobile, and New Orleans via the Atlantic Ocean and the Gulf of Mexico."

"The least convenient route was overland, as roads were still of very poor quality and it was far less efficient to haul goods using carts and livestock when compared to using boats on waterways."
-hope tht helps :)

nasty-shy [4]3 years ago

4 0

Answer:

Mississippi river

Explanation:

You might be interested in

Which part of Akkadian culture did the Babylonians adopt?

sergij07 [2.7K]

Answer:

in the Arabian Peninsula

8 0

2 years ago

PLEASE HELP!!

jeka57 [31]

Answer:

It ethier the forst or second Im so sorry if im wrong!

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Our responsibility to protect a citizens/soldiers private information stored on an automated information system is outlined in t

jekas [21]

<span>The act that protects the private information of both citizens and soldiers is the privacy act of 1974. Without this, the government and private entities would be able to access your personal data, and potentially use it for morally dubious purposes, or find out information you might want to be kept a secret.</span>

5 0

3 years ago

Why did the independent government of Mexico encourage Americans to settle in Texas?

GrogVix [38]

Short, quick answer would be,

"the national government of Mexico encouraged settlers in present-day Texas to settle in that region because of the anticipated prosperity and economic development the new population would bring."

7 0

3 years ago

A participant is asked to memorize a series of word pairs, including the pair “heavy–light.” The participant is asked later if a

stira [4]

Answer:

what was memorized was the idea of "light" as a description of weight, not "light" as illumination

Explanation:

When the research participant memorized the words “heavy – light” his brain associated with the words “light” unicament in the sense of weight. In this context, the participant's brain disassociated the word from any meaning other than that previously associated. Thus, when faced with the word "light" written with the sense of luminosity, the participant's brain did not allow the participant to remember that he had seen this word before.

3 0

3 years ago