No, human-inaccessible decisions doesn't help data science contribute to the interplay of human and artificial intelligence because data science does not contribute to the interaction between human and artificial intelligence in a way that renders judgments inaccessible to humans.
<h3>
What is the difference between human and artificial intelligence?</h3>
Whether it is human or artificial, intelligence is crucial. Human intelligence is a quality that aids people in learning, comprehending, and coming up with innovative solutions to problems, as opposed to artificial intelligence, which imitates people based on the knowledge it is given.
<h3>
Can humans have artificial intelligence?</h3>
In order for the area to advance, engineers are needed to design and test AI systems. Humans and AI cannot be swapped since neither can exist without the other. Many developers believe that in the future, robots may be able to reason for themselves.
Learn more about human and artificial intelligence: brainly.com/question/23791705
#SPJ4
Answer:
b. Social consensus is agreement on whether behavior is bad or good, whereas magnitude of consequences is the total harm or benefit derived from an ethical decision.
Explanation:
Social consensus can be defined as a principle or theory which is used to distinguish between what is deemed good or bad in the behavior of the people living in a society.
On the other hand, the magnitude of consequences refers to the overall harm or benefit that is associated with an ethical decision chosen by an individual or group of people.
The difference between social consensus and magnitude of consequences is that social consensus is agreement on whether behavior is bad or good, whereas magnitude of consequences is the total harm or benefit derived from an ethical decision.
The answer is extrinsic motivation because an extrinsic
motivation is a motivation where in the motivation of an individual is driven
or triggered by external rewards in which makes the individual feel more
motivated such examples is money or
fame.
The statement above would be FALSE. Though not all, there are some people who are naturally born with capabilities to lead and other certain activities, but this does not mean that these capabilities won't change. Change may mean improve or not, depending on the exposure of the person. If the person has been exposed in activities about leadership, then the skills he or she has would change in an improved way.
