1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
il63 [147K]
3 years ago
9

Why were Loyalists willing to support continued British rule but Patriots were not?

History
1 answer:
Makovka662 [10]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

Patriots argued that citizens must give up freedoms to ensure security, but Loyalists disagreed.

Explanation:

I just did this and it was right but from my understanding patriots didn't want nobody to have freedom instead give up their freedom for security but the loyalists wanted everybody to have freedom and everybody to live how they want.

You might be interested in
Select the correct answer. A governor operates in which branch of state government? A. Legislative B. Judicial C. Executive D. D
zmey [24]

Answer:

A governor operates in the (C.) Executive branch

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
What topics in society still exist due to 9-11?
LUCKY_DIMON [66]

Answer:

Some popular topics that still exist in society due to 9-11 are, "Bush did 9-11," "Jet fuel can't melt steel beams," and "Simpsons predicted 9-11."

Explanation:

Despite the many lives that were lost and the security that was penetrated, 9-11 birthed many mid-tier memes, which make for great discussion topics. /r

3 0
3 years ago
Which action did Japan take during the Meiji
Sati [7]
(2) sent experts to learn from modern western nations
during the meiji restoration, japan was trying to modernize because they wanted to catch up with the rest of the world powers
i hope this helps!
7 0
3 years ago
Does George Washington agree or disagree with becoming involved in world affairs?
joja [24]

Answer

Neutral i think

Explanation:

Washington recognizes that it is natural for people to organize and operate within groups such as political parties, but he also argues that every government has recognized political parties as an enemy and has sought to repress them because of their tendency to seek more power than other groups and to take revenge.

4 0
3 years ago
Explain the rational as to why people created government
nata0808 [166]

Answer:

Explanation:

Problem Solving

Identifying Basic Rights

Think of a right you believe all people should have. For example, you probably agree that everyone in the United States has the right to be protected from robbers and burglars. The belief that everyone should have this protection is shared by most people in the United States. We hear about it on television, in the newspaper, and in discussions.

Individually or in small groups, explain how you think rights like the one you have identified can be protected.

Defining "Natural Rights"

Most people in the American colonies believed that everyone had a right to life, liberty, and property. These rights were called natural rights. (Sometimes these are now called basic rights or fundamental rights.) The idea of natural rights means that all persons have these rights just because they are human beings. Everyone is born with these rights and they should not be taken away without a person's agreement.

Many of the Founders believed people receive these rights from God. Others believed that people have them just because it is natural for people to have them.

John Locke was a famous English philosopher. He lived from 1632 to 1704. He had written a book called Two Treatises of Civil Government (1690). In that book he wrote about natural rights. He said that the main purpose of government should be to protect the people's natural rights. He also said that kings should not have absolute power, that is, power without limits. They should not be able to deprive people of their natural rights.

Many Americans had read Locke's book, and they agreed with what it said about government. Those who had not actually read Locke's book knew his ideas from newspapers, political pamphlets, church sermons, and discussions.

Protecting Natural Rights

Although people agreed on certain natural rights, they worried about how those rights could be protected. Locke and others thought about what life would be like in a situation where there was no government and no laws. They called this situation a state of nature. They were afraid that in a state of nature their rights would be taken away.

Think what your classroom might be like if there were no rules.

Problem Solving

It's your turn to think like a philosopher

Imagine what life might be like in a state of nature. Think what your classroom might be like if there were no rules. Think what might happen if the teacher didn't have the right to tell anyone what to do.

Work together in groups of about five to answer the following questions about such a situation. Then choose a person to explain your answers to the rest of the class. Then compare your answers with John Locke's which follow.

What might be the advantages and disadvantages of living in a state of nature?

What might happen to people's rights?

What might life be like for everyone?

Compare Your List with John Locke's

You may have seen the same disadvantages in a state of nature that John Locke saw. Locke believed:

The stronger and smarter people might try to take away other people's lives, liberty, or property.

Weaker people might band together and take away the rights of the stronger and smarter people.

People would be unprotected and insecure.

The Social Compact

John Locke and other philosophers developed a solution to the problems that exist in a place without government. In a state of nature, people might feel free to do anything they want to do. However, their rights would not be protected and they would feel insecure.

Locke argued that people should agree with one another to give up some of their freedom in exchange for protection and security. They should consent to follow some laws in exchange for the protection that these laws would give them. This agreement is called a social compact or social contract. A social compact is an agreement people make among themselves to create a government to rule them and protect their natural rights. In this agreement the people consent to obey the laws created by that government.

In a later lesson, you will study the Declaration of Independence. You will see how the Founders included all of the ideas you have studied in this lesson in the Declaration.

4 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Why did the United States attack Afghanistan following the terrorist attack on September 11, 2001?
    12·2 answers
  • Explain how the Christian Church splits even more after Martin Luther and King Henry VIII had already split before. List AT LEAS
    14·1 answer
  • Both parliamentary and presidential democratic governments have three separate branches of government: executive, legislative an
    6·2 answers
  • Hole
    15·1 answer
  • Which statements describe Alexander l?
    5·2 answers
  • Facts about Wilson Churchill, please...? How he lead Britain to victory in ww2..
    14·1 answer
  • Which of the following was the most significant decision of John Marshall’s Supreme Court?
    6·2 answers
  • Which explains why the reign of Pharaoh Hatshepsut was important?
    6·1 answer
  • Please help i will give brainlesit
    9·2 answers
  • HI PLEASE HELP !!!!!!!!!!
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!