1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Levart [38]
3 years ago
8

Describe the strengths and weaknesses of the North and the South at the start of the Civil War.

History
1 answer:
34kurt3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

<h2>North</h2><h3>                                       Strength </h3>
  1. The North had an enormous industrial advantage
  2. the North manufactured 97 percent of the country's firearms

                                            Weakness

  1. . They did not know the land the other side  were fighting on the defensive in its own territory and were familiar with the landscape
<h2>South</h2>

                                            Weakness

  1. At the beginning of the war, the Confederacy had only one-ninth the industrial capacity of the Union.
  2. There was not even one rifle works in the entire South
<h3>                                       Strength</h3>
  1. The South could produce all the food it needed
  2. The South also had a great nucleus of TRAINED OFFICERS. Seven of the eight military colleges in the country were in the South.
You might be interested in
Hello i need help<br><br> who were the two leaders of the inca empire?
Leya [2.2K]

Answer:

At the time of the Spanish Conquest the two leaders of the Incan Empire were Atahualpa and Huascar.

Explanation:

Atahualpa and Huascar were allegedly stepbrothers, their father was the great Incan leader Huayna Capac who they say died of smallpox. As the Spanish arrived and started the Conquest of what is today Peru they landed in the middle of an Incan civil war that had Huascar and his supporters based in Cusco and Atahualpa based in the North where his father had been reigning. Huascar was allegedly killed by Atahualpa's orders because Atahualpa planned to ransom his own release with gold for the Spanish, and Huascar was trying to do the same. Eventually, Atahualpa is betrayed despite providing ransom and killed by the Spanish in Cajamarca.  The Spanish name another stepbrother and son of Huayna Capac, Manco Capac II as the Emperor to succeed after Atahualpa. Manco Capac II eventually rebels against the Spanish and retreats from Cusco to Vilcabamba. Vilcabamba is the last site of Incan resistance to Spanish encroachment in the early colonial years.  

3 0
3 years ago
Which of the following describes a key difference between feudalism in Europe and feudalism in Japan?
Naddik [55]

The answer choice that best describes a key difference between feudalism in Europe and feudalism in Japan is D. In Europe feudal lords owned all their lands, while in Japan the peasants owned the land they worked.

<h3>What is the key difference between feudalism in Europe and feudalism in Japan?</h3>

The European knights gained land from their lords as a reward for fighting for them and their interests; they had direct control of the serfs that did the work on the land, however, the Japanese samurai did not own any land.

With this in mind, we can give a broad definition of the term "feudalism" and this means the medieval system in Europe of land ownership between a lord and his vassal.

Read more about feudalism here:

brainly.com/question/4141227

#SPJ1

4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is a political party, and why was this seen as something new that the writers of the Constitution didn't plan for?
jenyasd209 [6]

Answer:

A political party is an organization that coordinates candidates to compete in a particular country's elections. It is common for the members of a party to hold similar ideas about politics, and parties may promote specific ideological or policy goals.

Explanation:

5 0
2 years ago
Which of the following statements about the Civil War is FALSE?
Mars2501 [29]
C. Some Texans in support of the union attempt to avoid the draft by moving to Mexico .
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In looking at the impact of tche bombing of Hiroshima, if you had to make the decision, would you have used the atomic bomb duri
miv72 [106K]
Yes I would of done it because with out the bombs Japan would of never surrendered and the war would of probably lasted months longer with many more casualties on both sides.

I would of also done it as a show of force to the ussr I see it as a way to show them the destructive power of the us and her allies a way of saying don’t mess with the bull or you get the horns
7 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • What did the Nazis' "final solution" involved?
    7·1 answer
  • Please name the states!
    5·2 answers
  • Which was true of urban areas during the industrial revolution?
    5·1 answer
  • Which type of historical text typically is a collection of articles or essays with a common theme?
    8·1 answer
  • Which is an example of how the role of government in the united states and other western democracies changed during the great de
    14·2 answers
  • Which option best completes the diagram? Pleasee
    6·1 answer
  • The Bonus Army <br><br> Describe What did the Bonus Army and the federal troops have in common?
    10·1 answer
  • Weeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
    12·2 answers
  • Which barbarian tribe occupied the Balearic Islands?
    9·2 answers
  • Do you support the current life appointment system or do you think justices should be forced to retire? Why?
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!