Answer:
A) The first is a prediction about a recommendation the main argument opposes; the second is a conclusion drawn in order to support the main conclusion.
Explanation:
From the argument above by the two senators, it could be seen that the two Senators are argueing in favour and argainst the Tax. Senator Baker, was of the believe that his opponent, Senator Rothmore calling for increase in taxes to fund programs helps the long-term unemployed.
His argument was based soley on the unemployed without factoring in the small businesses that would be killed off as a result of the tax increment. The fall of small businesses would definitely affect the prediction he made about unemployed getting work. This is because, those unemployed can only work by the opportunities created by the small businesses.
Senator Baker only made the second conclusion inorder to support his argument on the need to lower taxes which would drive job creations thereby being a win-win situation for both the government and the citizens.
Answer: Checks and Balances System
The civil service system contributes to the well-functioning of the government, but does nothing to prevent abuses of power.
The spoils system is a practice where the winning party in an election gives civil service jobs to its supporters. This undermines the prevention of the arbitrary use of power.
The separation of powers contributes to limit the power one section of the government has, but it does not necessarily forge consensus.
<em>The checks and balances system, however, prevents the arbitrary use of power by allowing all powers to check on each other. It also fosters cooperation on divisive issues.
</em>
<span>It limited the power of the King. This was created due to the abuses by King
John. Most important of all, it was the
first document to record the rights of individuals. Even if it was too strengthen the power of
the barons, free were promised the right to fair trail and this was expanded in
1400 to include everyone. This helped
lay the seeds for future independence of the ordinary men from the nobility and
would bring about the eventual end of feudalism.</span>
Answer:
Nepal is known to be one of the most beautiful countries. Nepal is quite rich in mineral resources. Mineral deposits such as gold, mica, limestone, iron ore, copper are found in different parts of Nepal. Because of financial constraint and lack of technical and skilled manpower, progress in the field of mining is negligible.
Nepal is surrounded on three sides by India and on one side by China. With the innumerable natural resources that this country possesses and the rivalry between the two countries Nepal has always remained like yam in the middle of a sandwich.Nepal’s political situations have always been compromised because of the interference of these countries.
Nepal is a country prone to a number of natural disasters. It was hit by a massive earthquake in 2015, which took the lives of thousands of people and destroyed a chunk of property in the capital (Kathmandu). Nepal is also prone to a huge number of landslides that block roads and kill people. Regular natural disasters also contribute to making Nepal a poor country.
Water resources are abundantly available in Nepal, and the hospitality of this country is unparalleled to anything. However, the amount of exposure that Nepal needs to gain the world is less. There are lesser promotion activities that call upon tourists to visit Nepal, and this lack of promotion makes Nepal a less known country.
Even though we are rich in natural resources our development is loss because of manpower , Political Instability, Corrupt Bureaucracy,Lack of Industry,Natural Disasters.
Answer:
Explanation:
Democratic leaders emphasize collaboration and the free-flow of ideas.
While these leaders do allow shared participation in decision-making, they often decide who is a part of the group or committee tasked with making decisions.
Responsibility is shared among all members of staff with the leader present to offer guidance and keep discussions balanced and controlled.
Participative leadership instill mutual respect among those involved that create candid and open conversations.
Democratic leaders can often be seen in positions in nonprofit organizations, school boards, and forward-thinking companies.
