The sentence that can be removed <u>without affecting the explanation</u> is "<em>In the 1800s, the United States was still a very young nation, trying to solidify its identity</em>."
The reason this sentence can be removed is that it does not offer any necessary information to the explanation. The passage is about how technology leads to bigger cities. This information is conveyed just as efficiently without the need for the first sentence.
Rather than serving to offer information, the first sentence in the passage serves as a sort of <u>introduction</u> to the text. The very next sentence can just as easily serve as an intro to the passage while providing context for the development of early technology that led to the industrial revolution.
For these reasons, the sentence "<em>In the 1800s, the United States was still a very young nation, trying to solidify its identity</em>." can easily be removed from the passage <u>without affecting</u> the explanation.
To learn more visit:
brainly.com/question/816588?referrer=searchResults
Answer:
1. well-known
2. was
3. Increased
4. Across
Explanation:
Most of the spelling was incorrect but was a simple fix, I was confused about the layout of the question so I don't know what else you needed sorry.
Answer:
FALSE because "Sit!" is a sentence as when you instruct a dog to sit that is a whole sentence on its own.
Answer:
where is sentence 27
Explanation:
i can't answer without the sentence
The answer is B because the writing process makes you reflect on your ideas of what your going to write.
