Answer:
A. To persuade readers that the war should never happen.
The best revision of this sentence is the following:
The lawyer presented a clear argument to the jury (it was unbelievable how influenced they were by his case) in the hopes of winning the trial.
A pair of parentheses needs to be used in order to separate this information from the rest of the sentence and facilitate reading and comprehension. The information in the parentheses is related to the meaning of the sentence but in some way it interrupts the flow, so a pair of parentheses is necessary in order to indicate this.
To start off, you want to get zero population growth. That means you can eliminate A and D automatically since it's the opposite effect of what you want.
That leaves B and C. Both are good idea if I may say but, they are unreasonable and unethical. (Not as much as A and D) Although, it is only just a question.
After a good time of thinking this through I would pick letter C. Let me explain though.
It is very easy to increase the death rate. There are so many ways to achieve zero population growth by doing so.
Now, obviously this means you would have to (for a nicer term) put down people. Those I will not list but, you can surely image them if you'd wish.
The reason I took B out of the equation is because, I feel as though it would take too long. That's the only reason.
Like I said I would pick C. I hope this helps!!
Animals only understand the fear of pain and the fear of death is what Rainsford's attitude about animals at the begging of "The Most Dangerous Game
<span />
