Answer:
3. Reason
Explanation:
Many of the ancient philosophers thought the reason to be the core of humanity and wisdom, the most important characteristics.
<u>Plato’s </u><u>teachings divided the soul into three parts: will, appetite and reason</u>. These parts could clash (our earning and appetite could clash over reason or willpower clashes with the wants), <u>but to operate correctly reason should rule over all other aspects of a person's character</u>. Passion and spirit should never rule over human reason.
<u>Aristotle</u><u>, who was Plato’s student, adopted this idea</u>. He was the one who <u>defined people as rational animals</u> stating that what separates people from other creatures is exactly the<u> possibility to think reasonably. </u>
The correct answer is limited government intervention in the economy. Proponents of this quote believed in capitalism and entrepreneurship as vital in creating prosperity. As a result, they were opposed to government intervening to control business for instance to promote equality.
Answer:
Judicial review is the power of the courts to declare that acts of the other branches of government are unconstitutional, and thus unenforceable. For example if Congress were to pass a law banning newspapers from printing information about certain political matters, courts would have the authority to rule that this law violates the First Amendment, and is therefore unconstitutional. State courts also have the power to strike down their own state’s laws based on the state or federal constitutions.
Today, we take judicial review for granted. In fact, it is one of the main characteristics of government in the United States. On an almost daily basis, court decisions come down from around the country striking down state and federal rules as being unconstitutional. Some of the topics of these laws in recent times include same sex marriage bans, voter identification laws, gun restrictions, government surveillance programs and restrictions on abortion.
Other countries have also gotten in on the concept of judicial review. A Romanian court recently ruled that a law granting immunity to lawmakers and banning certain types of speech against public officials was unconstitutional. Greek courts have ruled that certain wage cuts for public employees are unconstitutional. The legal system of the European Union specifically gives the Court of Justice of the European Union the power of judicial review. The power of judicial review is also afforded to the courts of Canada, Japan, India and other countries. Clearly, the world trend is in favor of giving courts the power to review the acts of the other branches of government.
However, it was not always so. In fact, the idea that the courts have the power to strike down laws duly passed by the legislature is not much older than is the United States. In the civil law system, judges are seen as those who apply the law, with no power to create (or destroy) legal principles. In the (British) common law system, on which American law is based, judges are seen as sources of law, capable of creating new legal principles, and also capable of rejecting legal principles that are no longer valid. However, as Britain has no Constitution, the principle that a court could strike down a law as being unconstitutional was not relevant in Britain. Moreover, even to this day, Britain has an attachment to the idea of legislative supremacy. Therefore, judges in the United Kingdom do not have the power to strike down legislation.
Explanation:
nationalparalegal.edu /JudicialReview.aspx
Business owners should be held responsible for the employee injuries that occur in job. Business owners should beforehand see to it that the working environment is safe and it is the employee's sake that they should prioritize among others. So, the answer is letter D.
