The correct answer is more prosperous and less democratic
Japanese conquests led to a wave of euphoria and enthusiasm in Japan, which, coupled with extensive indoctrination, developed a strong nationalism that defended imperialist ambitions. Throughout the 1920s and 1930s, there was an extreme right-wing authoritarian regime in Japan that fueled nationalist militarism and Japanese imperialism.
This nationalist and imperialist discourse in Japan claimed that the mission in China was unique and exclusively civilizing, but it is known that Japanese interests were motivated by economic issues. During the 1930s, two incidents led to the Japanese invasion of Manchuria (northeastern China) and, finally, the start of the war.
Answer:
1) True
2) False
3) True
4) True
5) True
Explanation:
1) No doubts. It was an electric revolution. Until the arrival of the electric light, in addition to being poorly lit, in the houses there was a risk of fire and pollution. So when the light came with the turn of the century, that change affected not only everyday life but also industry and all aspects of contemporary society.
2) it was Nicola Tesla
3) Yes. The companies agreed to divide the continent into four time zones; the dividing lines adopted were very close to the ones we still use today
4) It was a great monopoly
5) Andrew Carnagie bought rival companies and pioneered the use of an economical and efficient method to convert iron into steel on an industrial scale. That was how Carnegie's company came to dominate steel production in the US.
The hope that Johnson have in accomplishing in which he
enacts a harsher plan was because he hopes to avoid secession that may happen
in the future in which, there might be a presence of withdrawal of membership
of which he does not want to happen.
probably stamps cuz ya know they're real tiny and they probably thought that in like 30 years no one would be sending a letter so they're like 'yea ok they're just sticky pieces of paper no one cares'
D. Worcester v. Georgia - <span>was a case in which the United States Supreme Court choose the conviction of Samuel </span>Worcester<span> and held that the </span>Georgia<span> criminal statute that prohibited non-Native Americans from being present on Native American lands without a license from the state was unconstitutional.</span><span>
</span>
