<span>The reason that people usually will be bothered by the absence of conventions of talk is that in our communication lies cultural similarities and differences. When we follow conventions of talk, we are following our cultural norms and this provides a level of comfort for those involved. When these are not followed, there is an uneasiness that comes with the unfamiliarity, and necessary assumptions about the meaning of the communication can not be made.</span>
Loneliness and social isolation have been linked with premature mortality and with functional decline in older people.
We found that high levels of loneliness, but not of social isolation, increased the risk of becoming physically frail.
Neither loneliness nor social isolation were associated with the rate of change in a more broadly defined frailty index.
Loneliness
Loneliness is a subjective feeling of dissatisfaction with one’s social relationships. Both social isolation and loneliness have been linked with increased mortality [2–4], incident heart disease [5, 6] and functional decline [7, 8]. Social isolation and loneliness tend to be correlated, albeit weakly .
Social isolation :
Social relationships are important for health . Most such research has focused on social isolation or loneliness. Social isolation is defined objectively using criteria such as having few contacts, little involvement in social activities and living alone.
Frailty :
Frailty is a clinical syndrome whose main feature is heightened vulnerability to stressors due to lowered physiological reserves, decline in the ability to maintain homeostasis and impairments in multiple systems
A frailty index score reflects the proportion of potential deficits present The phenotype model defines frailty in physical terms, whereas the cumulative deficit model uses a broader definition of frailty.
Learn more about Social isolation :
brainly.com/question/27485088
#SPJ4
Answer: At about the same time as.
In his study, Turiel interviewed children using hypothetical situations that resembled the types of struggles raised by the real-life events. The way that these children reasoned was very similar across real and hypothetical moral issues. Thus, we can say that children's ability to tell whether a character in a story has violated moral rules develops at about the same time as their ability to understand them in real life.