Between 1820 and 1850, Southern lawmakers consistently opposed protective tariffs because these tariffs increased the cost of imports.
3) increased the cost of imports
<u>Explanation:</u>
Southern states, for example, South Carolina battled that the duty was unlawful and was against the more current protectionist taxes, as they would need to pay yet Northern states favoured them since they fortified their modern based economy.
The motivation behind this levy was to go about as a solution for the contention made by the Tariff of 1828. The defensive Tariff of 1828 was basically made to secure the quickly developing industry-based economy of the North.
The Tariff of 1816, set a 20-25% expense on every single outside great. Prior to the War of 1812, obligations arrived at the midpoint of about 12.5%. The Significance of the Tariff of 1816: The Tariff of 1816 helped American organizations contend with British and European production lines.
Answer:
Explanation: This answer is a little tricky but I think its b
Answer:
Explanation:
Nation and Family is the most comprehensive study to date of the public discourses, processes of social mobilization, legislation and case law that formed India's three major personal law systems, which govern Hindus, Muslims, and Christians.
Explanation:
Anti-Federalism was a late-18th century movement that opposed the creation of a stronger U.S. federal government and which later opposed the ratification of the 1787 Constitution. The previous constitution, called the Articles of Confederation and Perpetual Union, gave state governments more authority. Led by Patrick Henry of Virginia, Anti-Federalists worried, among other things, that the position of president, then a novelty, might evolve into a monarchy. Though the Constitution was ratified and supplanted the Articles of Confederation, Anti-Federalist influence helped lead to the passage of the United States Bill of Rights.
The foreign policy model that features two countries that are in conflict with each other is what is known as a bipolar structure of international power.
A bipolar structure of international power can be described as a structure whereby the two countries that are involved have a lot of economic, political, cultural and international influence.
Due to the influence that both sides have they are able to control their regions and also other international regions.
Read more on brainly.com/question/25494349?referrer=searchResults
