Answer:
His own
Explanation:
As John develops the agenda, he wants to put the name of the appropriate person next to the agenda item. Whose name would he put next to the final task on the agenda, the task of documenting the results of the JAD session and preparing the report that will be sent to JAD team members?
a. Clark
b. Tom
c. Linda
d. His own
JAD session
Instead of a single one-on-one interview, analysts often use joint-application design sessions to gather data and information. Joint-application design (JAD) sessions are a series of lengthy, structured, group meetings in which users and IT professionals work together to design or develop an application.
John would put his name since he is the one thst developed the agenda and did all the documentation.
Answer: c) Both
Explanation: Crowdsourcing is defined as the splitting the collection of work ,analyzing and spreading it to make the process of tasks faster. It is usually done on news , media, information , articles etc.
Citizen journalism is the the form of journalism where the citizen plays the role by collecting information , analyzing and circulating the news and other information.
Janey is involved in both the acts of citizen journalism and crowd sourcing by featuring the news in newspaper as well as posting the information on the social media through which she is spreading the posts, story, articles, news etc.Thus, the correct option is option(c).
Answer:
sa aralin ito, natuklasan ko na ang sanaysay ay isang uri ng komposisyon na naglalaman ng kuro o opinyon ng may akda maaring ito ay isinulat upang bigyan ng impormasyon manghikayat o para mailahad ang nais ipabatid ar nararamdaman nga manunulat
<span>Christianity's ethical principals promoted acceptance of god into ones heart to cleanse yourself of sin, and live an eternal life. For a variety of reasons the savior story format used in the bible indicates that people resonated with hope, forgiveness, kindness, and generosity. This could have been an internal response to the perhaps brutish world depicted, where forgiveness may have seemed somewhat out of reach. The theme of sacrifice is also proposed, which worked for the ruling class, who fancied themselves as superior, god-like, and the working class peasants, who probably needed to think they would die and do something better than farm potatoes.</span>
Using one or more actual engineering-related cases as well as some workable ethical theories, argue whether
or not the SECEPP is a coherent and comprehensive code of conduct for the computing/IT profession. In
the support for your argument, describe some virtues of the ethical codes of conduct adopted by professional
societies such as the ACM and IEEE-CS, and list some shortcomings of these professional codes as well. In
your final analysis, discuss whether the advantages of having a code outweigh the prospects of not having
one.
General Guidelines
• Note: Your thesis must be argued using at least one of the “workable” ethical theories that have been
covered in readings/lecture. However, unlike recitations, feel free to draw in more than one ethical
theory if it will help you defend your thesis in a clear manner.
• Paper Length: 1,000 – 1,500 words or longer (not including front matter or references)
• Reference/Citation Format: Consistently use one of MLA, APA, or Chicago/Turabian.
• Rubric: The grading rubric for this assignment is contained on the next page.
Submission Instructions
A PDF version of your paper must be submitted before the due date and time via eLC. There will be an
assignment dropbox available for the sub
