The net pay of Marilyn will increase by $18.15 due to the increase in the federal withholding allowances from 3 to 4.
<h3>The computation of net pay considering various federal withholding allowances</h3>
Given,
Gross pay =$810
3 Federal withholding allowances =$37 (taken from the reference table)
4 Federal withholding allowances =$22 (taken from the reference table)
Federal state tax rate =21%
First, the state tax rate and the total amount of withholding for 3 Federal withholding allowances are computed:
Now, the state tax rate and the total amount of withholding for 4 Federal withholding allowances are computed:
The difference in the net pay will be the difference between $44.77 and $26.62, which is $18.15.
Therefore, Marilyn withholding will decrease from $44.77 to $26.62 that is increasing the net pay by $18.15
Learn more about federal-state tax, refer to the link:
brainly.com/question/25828729
What the managers are asking for steve to use is a <span>behaviorally anchored rating scale or most commonly called in the acronym as BARS. The numerical range of rating of this scale is between 5 to 9 which helps describe the type of performance incurred by the employee from poor to outstanding. This is used in the appraisal process of employees.</span>
Answer:
(A) Shawn has a comparative advantage in the production of donuts.
Explanation:
Shawn renounce to less goods than Sue when producing donuts.
This meas, Shawn has a comparative advantage in the production of donuts as their cost from the economic point of view are lower.
This do not imply that Sue cannot outproduce Shawn, it means it cost her more than Shawn
For example, if Sue produce 10 Donuts, but to produce donuts resing to produce 20 of other goods, each donut has an opportunity cost of 2
While Shawn can produce 8 donuts and resing to produce 8 of other goods:
each donut has an opportunity cost of 1
Therefore, is better for the overall economy to Shawn produce donuts and trade with Sue for the other good.
Answer:
The total number of scooters is 10
Explanation:
Total profit is maximized where Marginal Revenue (MR) = Total Marginal Cost
= 50 + 50 + 50 + 50 = $200
TR = P × Q = (300 - 5Q) × Q = 300Q - 5Q²
So, MR = 
= 300 - 2(5Q) = 300 - 10Q
Now, MR = 200 gives,
300 - 10Q = 200
So, 10Q = 300 - 200 = 100
So, Q = 
So, Q = 10
Answer:
D. Less; Less
Explanation:
Given that
CPI in 2005 = 1.68
Wage in 1972 = 7200
Wage in 2005 = 30,000
CPI in 1971 = 0.418
Therefore,
Real wage in 1972 = wage in 1972/CPI in 1972
= 7200/0.418
= $17,224.88
Real wage in 2005 = wage in 2005/CPI in 2005
= 30000/1.68
=$17,857.14
Thus, from the given data 1972 job paid LESS in nominal terms (7200 < 30000) and LESS in real terms (17,244.88 < 17,857.14) than the 2005 job.
