All categories

3 years ago

A(n) ________ ad tries to convince consumers that everyone else is already buying and enjoying the product, and they should too.

Business

1 answer:

Juliette [100K]3 years ago

5 0

Answer: Bandwagon

Explanation: Advertisements which are structured in other to pounce on the emotion of the target audience mainly by utilizing the the fact that some consumers are already on board to spur others. It aims to influence consumer decision by making it known that a certain group, market have embraced or adopted a certain product. The main intention is to appeal to other potential consumers to come on board in other to be a part of what others are doing or enjoying. It is usually regarded as a propaganda or persuasive marketing strategy.

You might be interested in

Gross Private Domestic Investment 75, U.S. Imports 22, Personal Consumption Expenditures 250, Consumption of Fixed Capital 25, N

Rama09 [41]

Answer: Gross Domestic Product (GDP) = 250 + 75 - 22 = $303 billion

Explanation:

Gross Private Domestic Investment 75

U.S. Imports 22

Personal Consumption Expenditures 250

Gross Domestic Product (GDP) = 250 + 75 - 22 = $303 billion

7 0

3 years ago

High Mountain Lumber (HML) has normal budgeted overhead costs of $115,150 and a normal capacity of 35,000 direct labor hours for

Furkat [3]

Answer:

Standard total overhead cost (0.5 hr x 25,000 x $3.29) 41,125

Less: Actual total overhead cost ($21,000 + $18,000) 39,000

Total overhead variance 2,125(F)

Standard overhead application rate

= <u>Budgeted overhead</u>

Budgeted direct labour hours

= <u>$115,150</u>

35,000 hours

= $3.29 per direct labour hour

Explanation:

Total overhead variance is the difference between standard total overhead cost and actual total overhead cost. Standard total overhead cost is the product of standard hours per unit, standard overhead application rate and actual output produced. Actual total overhead cost is the aggregate of actual variable overhead cost and actual fixed overhead cost. Standard overhead application rate is the ratio of budgeted overhead to budgeted direct labour hours (normal capacity).

6 0

3 years ago

When a company sells multiple products, an increase in total sales always results in an increase in total profits.

nevsk [136]

Hindsight is a wonderful thing in any business, or in life in general. We could make the best business decisions and maximise earnings if we had access to a crystal ball that could tell us exactly how many people would buy our goods.

<h3>What Is Cost-Volume-Profit (CVP) Analysis?</h3>

An approach to determining how changes in variable and fixed expenses impact a company's profit is through cost-volume-profit (CVP) analysis.

Companies can utilise CVP to determine how many units they must sell to attain a specific minimum profit margin or break even (pay all expenditures).

CVP analysis makes a number of presumptions, among them the constancy of the sales price, fixed costs, and variable costs per unit.

Learn more about Cost-Volume-Profit refer:

brainly.com/question/26711135

#SPJ4

5 0

2 years ago

Zola puts her toys away in the toy chest and goes to eat dinner. her brother, unbeknownst to her, decides to take all of her toy

insens350 [35]

1. Look for her toys in her toy chest. She didn’t even know that her brother hid her toys in the first place, so she’ll look for her toys in her toy chest, assuming she wants to play with them after dinner.
Hope this helps!

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Borghia Pharmaceuticals has $1 million allocated for capital expenditures. a. Which of the following projects should the company

balu736 [363]

Answer:

Please refer below the answer in detail

Explanation:

With a limited budget, the firm will first pursue projects with the highest return, and the allocate the remaining capital to the project with the second highest return, and so on until all capital is fully allocated. Based on the information, Project 6 has the highest return, followed by 1 and 3. These three projects together will cost:

350,000 + 300,000 + 250,000 = $900,000

After those three projects, the firm will have $100,000 left. The best out of remaining project is 7, but it costs 400,000, which the firm cannot afford. The best affordable project is 4, which offers a return of 12.1%. Hence, the firm should spend the remaining 100,000 on project 4.

The budget limit constraints the firm to give up project 7, which offers a NPV of $48,000. The firm is forced to choose project 4, which has a NPV of $14,000.

Thus the lost in market value of the firm = 48,000 - 14,000 = $34,000.

4 0

3 years ago