The body's immune system thinks what he/she is eating or inhaling is a pathogen. The immune system sends white blood cells to attack. This triggers an allergic reaction.
For example: I am allergic to asparagus (I'm not joking, I really am) and walnuts. Anytime I eat one of those, my body's immune system thinks it's a pathogen for some reason and attacks and triggers an allergic reaction in me. This makes my breathing hard and makes it really itchy. Good thing it's not that severe so I can eat some if I want, but sometimes allergic reactions could cause hospitalization or death.
Answer: All of the above.
Explanation:
To answer this, one must first take into account the severity of the disease with which the patient came to the hospital. Because<u> it is not appropriate to only compare the treatment of a hospital that received a patient with something mild, with the treatment of another hospital that received another patient but with a serious illness or damage</u>. Clearly, this second hospital is going to face a greater challenge in trying to save the life of the person who has come in. It is not the same to operate on a serious patient on the verge of death, as it is to operate on a healthy one for something minor that just because of that alone has a higher chance of survival. If something goes wrong, it is not necessarily or not entirely the hospital's responsibility. Someone who is more compromised in terms of their health will be more vulnerable and require greater care. While the hospital must be able to do this (and there may be some that are better than others) it must be kept in mind that the patient's previous health.
<u>The onset of one-year follow-up at both hospitals (post-operative versus discharge) will differ significantly between the two hospitals.</u> Each hospital will have have different staff, different doctors and nurses, different equipment and ways of handling. All this makes the treatments vary a lot from one hospital to another.
Something similar occurs with tje differences in postoperative care, that may vary from place to place. However it also depend on the underlying condition with which the patient has come, p<u>ostoperative care also varies according to how the staff is managed, the hygiene of the site, the resources available, and others. The same applies to equal follow-up for mortality.</u>
In summary, for all options it is necessary to keep in mind that while hospital care and staff training are very important, there is one variable that is beyond the scope of what doctors and nurses can do, and that is the severity with which the patient has come for care. The more serious the patient is, the more difficult it is going to be to treat him/her. However, the more modern the hospital and the better trained its staff, the more likely it is to cure more people.
One solution have a nice day please
The answer would be <span>Kyphosis </span>
Answer:
The correct answer is - option a. It should be testable in a valid period of time
Explanation:
A thought that presents a temporary clarification about a phenomenon observed by a scientist is a hypothesis. The fundamental highlights of a good scientific hypothesis are: testability and falsifiability
A testable scientific hypothesis should answer the logical question. This is one that can be checked valid or bogus utilizing the information gathered or the experience gained.
a good scientific hypothesis must be testable and falsifiable. We should have the option to test the hypothesis utilizing the techniques for science and in the event that you'll review Popper's falsifiability rule, it must be conceivable to accumulate proof that will disconfirm the theory on the off chance that it is surely false.
Thus, the correct answer is - option a. It should be testable in a valid period of time