Answer:
US troops were ill-prepared to fight in Vietnam's environment.
Explanation:
"We didn't operate well in Vietnam. We weren't prepared
for what we found there." shows that they were very ill-prepared for the Vietnam Environment.
<span>Foremost, the Mongols produced a charismatic leader, Genghis Khan, who united the Mongol tribes in a dream of conquest and expansion.The Mongolian horse, a small and very tough infantry horse which could move very quickly and run long distances. Mongol troops were all horse-mounted and could move very quickly.The Mongol bow was a very small composite bow which could accurately shoot an arrow more than 200 yards. Combined with the fast-moving horse mounted infantry, the Mongols had a great advantage.Mongol tactics focused on speed and mobility. If a city quickly surrendered, they were lenient, but if it resisted, they were ruthless.<span>When necessary, the Mongols were willing to co-opt needed talent. For instance, when they needed to lay siege to a city, they would rely on Chinese siege engineers to lay siege to Baghdad. Compared to the empires they conquered, they weren't racist in how they used people.</span></span>
Answer: Historiography for the Purpose of Nationalism.
Explanation:
The emergence of nationalism in a world dating back to the late eighteenth century. Get your full swing in the next two. Nationalism is reflected through all pores of political, social and scientific life. The emergence of nationalism also reflected on historiography.
Many historians have been encouraged by nationalism. Many of these works have emerged as a result of these tendencies. It is often a syndrome of lesser value because myths characterize most of these historical works. Their scientific value is also called into question. The historian must be objective when writing. The question is, where does this phenomenon come from? Nationalism in historiography seeks to portray, one national entity as larger than another. That is, to minorize another. A patriot historian can be objective, unlike a nationalist.
Answer:
Mao Zedong, I believe (Sorry if its not right)
Explanation:
A higher animal population
hope this helped
;)
