Because the Constitution as written is a pretty well written and well thought out document. It should be hard to change so that some radical (who also controls both chambers of Congress with veto proof margins) can not come in and change it on a whim.
<span>The logic being that IF the situation has significantly changed that enough of the people would recognize it and agree to the Amendment. </span>
Answer:
im confused what is the question
Explanation:
Word War II (WW2) would be your answer. Hope this helps!
Answer:
C. The Senate rejected President Ronald Reagan's nomination of Robert Bork to the Supreme Court
Explanation:
Given that Checks and balances is one of the principles of democratic government whereby each branch of government has the power to check the actions of the other. For example, the legislative branch of the government taking a decision that checks the actions of the executive. This is usually done to prevent the arbitrary use of power, thereby balancing the use of power.
Hence, in this case, the statement that best illustrates the system of checks and balances is "The Senate rejected President Ronald Reagan's nomination of Robert Bork to the Supreme Court"
Answer:
In the 5th century, they invaded the declining Roman Empire and they gradually carved it up the between them. 'The barbarians' never intended to destroy the Roman Empire, they wanted to share in its wealth but it was declining anyway and soon broke down altogether.
(Brainliest is appreciated :)