These students were forbidden to talk in their own languages, keep to their customs (such as keep their long hair, follow their religions, etc)
hope this helps
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Should the US have become an empire?
No of course not, because that would have been in direct opposition to the elevated ideas expressed by the United States Founding fathers when they created the US Constitution and established the new form of government during the Constitutional Convention held in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania in the summer of 1787.
Nevertheless, as it happens in the history of the nations, there were Presidents that under the idea of the Manifested Destiny tried to expand the US territory waging war, invading, and supporting imperialistic ideals, as was the case of President James Polk. It was the time of the Mexican-American War when the United States got the territories of California, Arizona, and New Mexico, Other Presidents had similar foreign policies.
How long could the US have maintained an isolationist policy toward the world?
Basically, the US developed the concept of isolationism during two important times in modern history. First, at the beginning of World War I. US President Woodrow Wilson tried to maint the foreign policy of neutrality. Years later, at the beginning of World War II, US President Franklin D. Roosevelt tried to do the same. In both cases, after terrible events, both presidents decided to enter the war.
Protect the United States and Americans; Advance democracy, human rights, and other global interests; Promote international understanding of American values and policies; and. Support U.S. diplomats, government officials, and all other personnel at home and abroad who make these goals a reality.
Answer: I’m honestly not surprised because it definitely seems like a very one sided decision. The United States Supreme Court was presented with an opportunity to correct the error of their ruling in Roe. Instead, the Court arrogantly chose to maintain their position in an all too common case of “repeat judicial activism.” In the courtroom, decisions are too often guided – not by legislation – but rather by so-called “case-law,” i.e., past court decisions, or precedent. This adherence to “precedent” is said to provide consistency and uniformity among the numerous courts of the United States. However, blind adherence to bad precedents results in the “consistent and uniform” multiplication of bad results.
Explanation:
Explanation:
The Battle of Baltimore was a sea/land battle fought between British invaders and American defenders in the War of 1812. American forces repulsed sea and land invasions off the busy port city of Baltimore, Maryland, and killed the commander of the invading British forces. The British and Americans first met at the Battle of North Point.[9] Though the Americans retreated, the battle was a successful delaying action that inflicted heavy casualties on the British, halted their advance and, consequently, allowed the defenders at Baltimore to properly prepare for an attack.