Answer:
The reason why spanish contact with Incas drove capitalism in Europe is multifold. After being exposed to the riches of the Incas empire, more and more ships were created in Europe (introducing more producers of ships and shipping supplies, etc.) because more and more people wanted to go to the New world themselves and exploit the riches that were available there.
Answer:
The battle of Stalingrad prevented Germany from successfully gaining control of Moscow.
Explanation:
Germany's failure to capture Stalingrad ultimately led to Germany's failure to capture Moscow and defeat the Soviet Union. Capturing Stalingrad would've given Germany access to the USSR's oil supply, giving the Germans the upper hand against fighting the Russians. They weren't able to successfully capture and had to back off from the offensive.
<em>Good luck, i hope this helps :)</em>
Without U-2, Eisenhower would have met with Kruschev, and they might have come to a positive resolution on the issue of Cuba.
<span>With Cuba resolved, Eisenhower would not have needed to launch the Bay of Pigs invasion; Castro bringing in missiles was a direct reaction to the Bay of Pigs. No Bay of Pigs, no Cuban Missile Crisis. </span>
<span>Without the Cuban Missile Crisis, tensions between the US and USSR would have been reduced. Still there obviously, but reduced. It is likely Kennedy could have come to an agreement to significantly slow, if not end, the arms race with the USSR. </span>
<span>And if Cuba and nuclear weapons were on a lower simmer, the US might have been less likely to stay in Vietnam. Both Yarmolinsky and McNamara had misgivings as early as 1963 about Vietnam. If the Cold War was cooler, they might have been able to keep that fire out. </span>
<span>It's possible the Cold War could have taken an entirely different turn if not for one airplane being shot down.</span>
Answer: Majority of the citizens would welcome him back.
Explanation:
He brought new forms of technology, improved economics conditions, etc. He was a strong leader, inspired soldiers (even those who were captured), and had charisma. The cons of him being a leader though, was the fact that he was dishonest and power hungry.
Answer:
A leading attorney who argued many famous cases in the Supreme Court.On appeal their case reached the Supreme Court as Worcester v. Georgia (1832), and the Court held that the Cherokee Nation was "a distinct political community" within which Georgia law had no force. The Georgia law was therefore unconstitutional.
