1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
loris [4]
4 years ago
8

Choose the answer that correctly expresses this number with scientific notation.56,000

Mathematics
1 answer:
strojnjashka [21]4 years ago
8 0

the answer should be

5.6x10^-4

You might be interested in
Let f(x) = 5x ^ 2 - x + 1 and g(x) = - 3x . Evaluate the composition (fg)(1)
nlexa [21]
F(x) = 5(-3x) ^2 - (-3x) + 1
f(x) = -8x ^2 + 3x + 1
f(x) = -8x ^3 + 3x
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
To find 19 + (11+37), Lennie added 19 and 11. Then he added 37 to the sum. What property did he use ?
Ad libitum [116K]

19 + (11+37) = (19 + 11) + 37

Associative property of addition

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Is -x+4y=-2 a direct variation?
In-s [12.5K]

Answer:

No

Step-by-step explanation:

Direct variation: two variables, one variable is a constant multiple of another variable

y = k x  .... k constant

-x+4y=-2

4y = x - 2

y = 1/4 x -1/2  ..... y = k x + b    y is not a simple multiple of x

6 0
4 years ago
Math algebra 2 show you’re work plz
LenKa [72]

9514 1404 393

Answer:

  (t, u, w) = (1, -2, -2)

Step-by-step explanation:

A graphing calculator makes short work of this, giving the solution as ...

  (t, u, w) = (1, -2, -2)

__

There are many ways to solve this "by hand." Here's one of them.

Add the first and third equations. Their sum is ...

  -3t +4w = -11 . . . . . [eq4]

Add this to twice the second equation. That sum is ...

  (-3t +4w) +2(-4t -2w) = (-11) +2(0)

  -11t = -11

  t = 1

Substituting this into the second equation gives ...

  -4(1) -2w = 0

  w +2 = 0 . . . . divide by -2

  w = -2 . . . . add -2

Substituting for t in the third equation lets us find u.

  2(1) -2u = 6

  -1 +u = -3 . . . . . divide by -2

  u = -2 . . . . add 1

The solution is (t, u, w) = (1, -2, -2).

5 0
3 years ago
FOR BRAINLIEST<br> Express 0.64 as a fraction in lowest terms.<br> 5/32<br> 64/10<br> 16/25<br> 4/5
Nadusha1986 [10]

Answer:In its decimal form, it says  ' 64 / 100 '.

In order to change it to its lowest terms, we look to see whether the

numerator and denominator have a common factor greater than ' 1 '.

If they do, then we can divide numerator and denominator by their

common factor, and have the same fraction in lower terms.

The common factors of  64  and  100  are  1,  2, and  4 .

We could divide top and bottom by 2, but that wouldn't finish the job.

It's always best to divide them by their greatest common factor, and

once you do that, you're done.

Dividing the numerator and denominator both by  4,

we get the fraction in its lowest terms:

        0.64  =  64/100  =  16/25

Step-by-step explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • I have no idea how to do this! Can somebody please help me out a little?
    13·1 answer
  • 18-5x=48 plzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz help step by step
    9·1 answer
  • 26-4s=9s what's the answer
    11·2 answers
  • Morgan is arranging a bowling party for his friends. The party room at the bowling alley is $35. The bowling alley offers a part
    7·2 answers
  • Find the length of the third side to the nearest tenth.
    14·1 answer
  • The equation d = can be used to calculate the density, d, of an object with mass, m, and volume, V. Which is an equivalent equat
    11·2 answers
  • The fight time from Boston to London is 6 hours 20 minutes
    10·2 answers
  • Given the following exponential function, identify whether the change represents
    6·1 answer
  • Is 18,107,190 divisible by 3?<br><br><br>YES or NO<br><br><br>HELP ME PLZ I"M CRYING!
    14·2 answers
  • Select all the rational numbers
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!