Answer:
It improves employee retention and performance motivation.
Explanation:
There are few factors that keep employee motivated and loyal toward organization. The basic factors are career path and monetary benefits that keep the energy flow in the employee.
A formal succession plan is a human resource management strategy for identifying the potential successor, it reduces the confusion for the organization and employee in the method of hiring and promotion. These strategies also keep an employee motivated, improve performance and retention in the organization as they find growth and security in the organization.
Answer:
The correct answer is option A.
Explanation:
A market outcome will be considered economically efficient if the marginal benefit earned from the last unit is equal to the marginal cost incurred in the production of the last unit while the economic surplus or the sum of consumer surplus and producer surplus is at maximum.
If the marginal cost and benefit are not equal then the outcome is said to inefficient. It means that either the resources are not being allocated efficiently or the production is not efficient.
Answer:
Instructions are listed below
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
Ms. Langley is 30 years old and has begun a retirement plan that permits her to place monthly amounts of $400 into a retirement vehicle, beginning one month from now, for 30 consecutive years.
When Ms. Langley reaches her retirement at age 60, she expects to live for 25 more years. The interest rate is 6%.
First, we need to calculate the amount of money that she will have at age 60, using the following formula.
FV= {A*[(1+i)^n-1]}/i
A= monthly deposit= 400
n= 30*12= 360
i= 0.06/12= 0.005
FV= {400[(1.005^360)-1]}/0.005= $401,806.02
Months= 25years*12= 300 months
Monthly= 401,806.02/300= $1,339.35
Answer:
$(94,179)
Explanation:
Particulars Year 0 Year 1 Year 2
Cash flows ($1,500,000) A$1,000,000 A$2,000,000
DCF 14% 1 0.8772 0.7695
Present Values 1500,000 A$877,200 A$ 1,538,935
Conversion 1 0.55 0.60
P V in US$ (1,500,000) 482,460 923,361
Therefore Net Present Value = 482,460 +923,361 - 1,500,000 = $(94,179)
<span>a) If energy prices go up, manufacturing costs go up, which ultimately increases the price of the notebook. This will also most likely lead to a decrease in quantity, as the manufacturing cost per unit is higher. This is a supply determinant.
b) In theory, the subsidy reduces the cost per unit to the manufacturer, which increases supply and often reduces price, again being a supply-side determinant. In reality, it creates an incentive for notebook manufacturers to keep doing what they are doing, disincentivizing cost-saving developments and alternatives. Why innovate when you can get free government cheese?
Anyway, supply determinant.
c) The price of an inferior good increasing tends to push some demand for superior goods, especially when the income to cost of good ratio remains the same for the inferior good but gets better for the superior one. Demand determinant. </span>
