<span>Apparently, the supporters of the
exclusionary rule argue that the rule is the one effective deterrent against
police misconduct because according to them, the rule must be preserved in
order to guarantee that the constitutional rights are must be honored.
Moreover, in contrast to those who want to see the exclusionary rule abolished
argue that the treat of civil lawsuits should be enough to deter police
misconduct because they believed that the rule costs are too much and it
operates to precent juries from considering highly relevant evident in which it
sometimes operated to allow the guilty to go free. </span>
Answer:
Judaism, Christnaty,Islam (sorry if i spellt them wrong)
Explanation:
Europe, africa, and asia.
Answer:
c. lower private saving and raise public saving.
Explanation:
According to the definitions of national saving and private saving, if Y, C, and G remained the same, an increase in taxes would lower private saving and raise public saving.
The answer is it allowed people to work further away.
