Answer:
Explanation:
The scientific revolution was the part of the Renaissance, and it is notable for a series of changes in society, education, and knowledge, which resulted in a string of new discoveries and new views on the world. Before the scientific revolution, <u>the Church had the dominance over the learning, dictating who will be able to learn and what</u>; yet, as a result of this period, knowledge and science were more available and widely distributed. <u>Scientists had more democratic ideas about the world and society, which in the end resulted in the more humane views and laws. All of these circumstances weakened the Church and its impact on society.</u>
<u>The discoveries of the revolution questioned some of the preceding pieces of knowledge supported by the Church, most notably the idea that the Sun goes around the Earth.</u> Nicolaus Copernicus was one of the first scientists who proposed heliocentric theory, and people started to realize the Earth revolves around the Sun. T<u>his idea challenged religious believes, and the Church was afraid people would lose faith and trust in God. All of this finally resulted in the loss of the Church’s complete dominance and change of some dogmas that were previously preached heavily. </u>
<u>While, of course, people still have faith and believe in God today,</u><u> these events changed the complete sovereignty that the institution of the Church had previously, as well as some of Christianity's teachings. </u>
T started when Francisco Madero called for an overthrow to Porfirio Diaz after a corrupt election. It lasted for more than a decade, killing nearly a million people--however, it also created the modern Mexican state, gave the country its modern constitution (in 1917) and eventually leading to the creation of its ruling party, the PRI. Basically, the Revolution transformed Mexico from a country dominated by rural aristocrats to one dominated by an urban elite.
Answer:
The Answer is Automobiles.
Answer: A. High- High
Explanation: Ethical dissonance as such arises due to inconsistencies in attaining and maintaining a moral image of oneself and being tempted to exploit some unethical situation for the sake of personal gain. In other words, it is the interaction of the company / organisation and the individual with the aim of adapting the individual and the organisation in different possible situations and scenarios. It is a two-way process because the ethics of an individual influences the organisation, simply the individual enters his / her ethics. Also the ethics of the organisation influences the behaviour of the individual.
Of the four possible fit models / options, high-high is one of two fit options that have a high person-organisation fit. So this is a model that provides a fit relationship between the organisation and the individual. When an individual has a high level of ethics, and organisation too, fit with an organisation of course high. That's the case here.
There is another high fit, therefore the agreement of organisations and individuals, but this is not the case here, when a person is of low ethics. Then for that individual it is a high fit of course if it is also a low ethics organisation, such an organisation suits a low ethics individual.
The other two cases of fit are when there is a low level of fit between the organisation and the individual.
